The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
PUMA Survey 4.1. Insights in societal changes in Austria
Creator
PUMA (Plattform für Umfragen, Methoden und empirische Analysen)
Study number / PID
doi:10.11587/TSMPEY (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
PUMA Survey
PUMA (Plattform für Umfragen, Methoden und empirische Analysen) Surveys consist of separate modules designed and prepared by different principle investigators.
Abstract
Full edition for scientific use. PUMA Surveys consist of separate modules designed and prepared by different principle investigators. Fieldwork was conducted by Statistics Austria. This PUMA Survey consists of three modules: MODULE 1 "Family Background and the Intrahousehold Distribution of Resources - Explaining Gender Differences in Education", MODULE 2 "Voting Systems and Democratic Satisfaction - An Experimental Study", MODUL 3 "Skala zur Messung autoritärer Einstellungen in Österreich". MODULE 1: Family Background and the Intrahousehold Distribution of Resources: Explaining Gender Differences in Education (Alyssa Schneebaum, Doris Oberdabernig)
This research analyzes the role of family background in a person’s opportunities for later academic success. In particular, it studies the relationship between one’s own educational attainment and three other issues: the educational attainment of his or her parents; the academic environment at home while growing up; and the distribution of resources among siblings in a household. The first issue has been studied at great length in the international literature and is considered one of the critical components of “equality of opportunity.” If a descendant’s educational opportunities are very strongly determined by his or her parents’ academic achievements (or lack thereof), then a society is not providing equal opportunities. The second point -- the academic environment at home (typically proxied by data on the number of books at home while one was growing up) -- is certainly related to the first, but has never appeared in the literature for Austria. This research should fill that gap. The third point asks how a child’s chances of educational success are related to the presence of other children in the household while they were growing up (primarily their siblings). More specifically, which children are most likely to receive a family’s limited resources when there are multiple children in the household? How is a...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
09/02/2018 - 22/03/2018
Country
Austria
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Resident population of Austria aged 16 to 74
Sampling procedure
Probability
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based
Funding information
Funder
BMBWF
Grant number
HRSM - PUMA
Access
Publisher
The Austrian Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2018
Terms of data access
For more Information please visit AUSSDA's web page