Summary information

Study title

PUMA Survey 3.1. Insights in societal changes in Austria

Creator

PUMA (Plattform für Umfragen, Methoden und empirische Analysen)

Study number / PID

doi:10.11587/QEM0JC (DOI)

Data access

Information not available

Series

PUMA Survey

PUMA (Plattform für Umfragen, Methoden und empirische Analysen) Surveys consist of separate modules designed and prepared by different principle investigators.

Abstract

Full edition for scientific use. PUMA Surveys consist of separate modules designed and prepared by different principle investigators. This PUMA Survey consists of three modules. Fieldwork was conducted by Statistics Austria.MODULE 1 (Ivo Ponocny, Eduard Brandstätter, Christian Weismayer). Self-ratings of life satisfaction and happiness often tend to disclose some harm and mischief people actually experience in life (see Staudinger, 2000, “happiness paradox”, Cummins & Nistico, 2002, “positivity bias”, and Ponocny, Weismayer, Dressler, & Stross, 2017). Therefore, an alternative classification called “narrated well-being” (NWB) was developed by the latter authors which seems to more directly reflect the negative circumstances in people’s lives, as tested on the basis of 500 quality-of-life interviews. However, this rating scheme could only be applied to external ratings of life narratives, but not to self-ratings, a gap to be filled by the present report. Similarly, the assessment of the most influential well- and ill-being drivers via open-ended questions – leaving it to the citizens which aspects of life they want to tell about – was not assessed in a large-scale assessment framework with a representative sampling frame. Furthermore, the question why in part drastic negative circumstance do not produce more negative self-ratings drew the attention on the role of obligation and burden, with the suspicion that persons with obligations tend to emphasize how well they cope with their challenges rather than evaluate based on their personal happiness. If this is true, then there is an ambiguity regarding the meaning of those self-ratings, with the potential for misinterpretation by researchers. These thoughts, if correct, will particularly apply to persons with responsibility for persons dependent on them, such as children and teenagers, and persons giving informal care. Consequently, the research goals are to i) determine the extent of burdensome circumstances,...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

15/09/2017 - 31/10/2017

Country

Austria

Time dimension

Cross-section

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Resident population of Austria aged 16 to 74

Sampling procedure

Probability

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based

Funding information

Funder

BMBWF

Grant number

HRSM - PUMA

Access

Publisher

The Austrian Social Science Data Archive

Publication year

2018

Terms of data access

For more Information please visit AUSSDA's web page

Related publications

Not available