Summary information

Study title

Tackling Smoker Misperceptions about E-cigarettes Using Expert Videos, 2019-2021

Creator

Maynard, O, University of Bristol

Study number / PID

855168 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-855168 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

The pervasive misperception that e-cigarettes are equally or more harmful than combustible cigarettes is a barrier to current smokers switching to e-cigarettes. To tackle misperceptions, public health bodies are using informational videos, although their efficacy is unknown. In our online study, current UK smokers who do not vape (n = 382) were randomized to view either: (1) a Cancer Research UK (CRUK) text-only video; (2) a video featuring leading e-cigarette experts (expert); or (3) a no video control condition, and then completed questions regarding e-cigarette harm perceptions. Compared to the control condition, participants in the CRUK condition, and especially those in the expert condition had more accurate harm perceptions of e-cigarettes and had more accurate knowledge of e-cigarette constituents. In the expert condition, 67% of individuals reported they would try an e-cigarette in a future quit attempt, compared with 51% in the CRUK condition and 35% in the control condition. Our findings are encouraging in the face of mounting evidence that e-cigarette misperceptions are increasing. Whilst misperceptions are often characterized as resistant to correction, we find that carefully designed public health information videos have the potential to promote a more accurate, informed view of e-cigarettes, and encourage intended e-cigarette use among UK smokers. Importantly, we find this among current smokers who do not vape, a group often reported as having the highest levels of misperceptions and as having the most to gain from accurate e-cigarette perceptions. There is mounting evidence that e-cigarette misperceptions are increasing, particularly among smokers who do not vape, a group who have most to gain from accurate information about e-cigarettes. Misperceptions are often characterized as difficult to change and there is relatively little research on how to correct e-cigarette misperceptions. Our research in the UK shows that, compared to controls,...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/12/2019 - 01/05/2021

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

We conducted an online between-subjects experimental study in February 2020 with UK smokers who do not use e-cigarettes (i.e., do not vape). Participants were randomized into one of the three conditions: CRUK video; expert video; or a no message control. Harm perceptions were the primary outcome measure. We published the study protocol on the Open Science Framework prior to starting testing and this includes more information about the study methods and the analysis plan (https://osf.io/ja34v/).Our pre-planned sample size calculation indicated that we needed 390 participants to observe a small effect size (f = 0.20) with 95% power and an alpha level of 5%. Further details are in the pre-registered protocol. We recruited an equal number of female and male participants opportunistically through Prolific, an online crowdsourcing platform. To be eligible for inclusion, participants were at least 18 years of age, lived in the UK and self-reported that they smoked daily, and did not vape (classified as using an e-cigarette less than monthly). Participants were reimbursed 13p for completing a short prescreening survey. Eligible participants were invited to participate in the main, 10 min experiment on Qualtrics for which they were reimbursed £1.30. The study was approved by the Faculty of Science Research Ethics Committee at the University of Bristol (reference: 23051753685).

Funding information

Grant number

ES/R003424/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2021

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available from an external repository. Access is available via Related Resources.

Related publications

Not available