The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Sustainable intensification of UK livestock production, a social scientific approach 2014-2016
Creator
Little, R, University of Sheffield
Study number / PID
853216 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853216 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The data presented here are in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted as part of the international comparative case study phase of the research. The research objectives were to gain insight into stakeholder perspectives on eradication efforts, assessing the relative merits of different policy interventions aimed at disease management and appraising the key factors affecting efforts to achieve TB eradication in Michigan and Minnesota, USA. The interviews were conducted with individuals identified as ‘experts’ and ‘key stakeholders’ involved in the development or implementation of bTB policies in Michigan and Minnesota.
The interviews consisted of questions relating to the participant’s role in bTB control; overview of the factors influencing the relative success of bTB control (including identifying effective policies and interventions); identification of key stakeholders and their positive or negative contribution to disease management; modes of risk communication and the challenges and successes encountered in promoting ‘best practice’ in disease mitigation; and lessons learnt from their experience of managing bTB in Michigan and Minnesota respectively. This project focuses on the human factors that influence the management of disease in livestock, analysing how and why livestock farmers make their decisions, and how this affects disease control, farm productivity and competitiveness, acceptance of agricultural innovation, and adoption of new technologies. Working closely with the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and research institutions in North America and mainland Europe, the project will: (1) Synthesise existing evidence on barriers and enablers affecting the implementation of Animal Health and Welfare (AHW) best practice. (2) Identify and examine successful examples of best practice co-production, communication and adoption (including state-sponsored advice, private advisory agencies and extension services) focusing on...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2014 - 31/12/2016
Country
United States, United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
The research approach was based upon in-depth interviews conducted at the end of 2014 with individuals identified as ‘experts’ and ‘key stakeholders’ involved in the development or implementation of bovine TB policies in Michigan and Minnesota, USA. Interviewees included agency professionals involved in TB management in cattle or wildlife (wildlife managers, programme coordinators, field veterinarians, and communications specialists); university academics and extension personnel; and producer and wildlife stakeholders involved in implementing management practices on the ground. Michigan: Interviews were conducted in the State Capitol of Lansing and in the area classified as a bovine TB 'Modified Accredited Zone' in the northeastern Lower Peninsula, concentrating on the counties of Alcona, Alpena, Montmorency and Oscoda.Minnesota: Interviews were conducted in the Minnesota State Capitol of Saint Paul and an area affected by a bovine TB outbreak in the late 2000s, Roseau County. The semi-structured interviews consisted of questions relating to the participant’s role in TB control; overview of the factors influencing the relative success of TB control (including identifying effective policies and interventions); identification of key stakeholders and their positive or negative contribution to disease management; modes of risk communication and the challenges and successes encountered in promoting ‘best practice’ in disease mitigation; and lessons learnt from their experience of managing bTB in Michigan and Minnesota, respectively. Interviews were digitally recorded (with the participants’ informed consent).
Funding information
Grant number
ES/K009753/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2018
Terms of data access
The data is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection (cc'ing in the ReShare inbox) to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data.