The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Promoting Sustainable Travel: a social marketing approach
Creator
Barr, S, University of Exeter
Study number / PID
851806 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-851806 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The objectives of the research were as follows: (1) to identify and measure a series of ‘sustainable travel behaviours’ using a sample of individuals from the general public; (2) to explore the empirical and conceptual links between different types of sustainable travel practices amongst the sample; (3) to use segmentation analysis to identify a series of lifestyle groups based on these behavioural data; (4) to use an established framework of environmental behaviour to identify the motivators and barriers for adopting different forms of behaviour according to lifestyle group;
(5) to use the results from objectives 1-4 to assist local and national policy makers in promoting sustainable lifestyle practices.
There were 3 primary data collection stages focused around 5 sites, selected for their residential type (high-density, inner-city suburban, low-density outskirts, commuter town and rural centre). In each location the following data collection was undertaken: (1)Two focus group discussions with members of the public selected through convenience based sample techniques in July 2008; (2) A questionnaire survey of 400 households selected using systematic random sampling, based on address lists provided by the Royal Mail Address Database; (3) One follow-up focus group discussion with selected respondents to the quantitative survey. In addition, five in-depth interviews were undertaken with participants to the questionnaire, one in each study location. It is a cross-sectional(one-time) study, interviews were conducted face-to-face, and the selection criteria for the sample was one-stage stratified, systematic random sample.
This research explores the motivations and barriers encountered by individuals for adopting more ‘sustainable’ forms of travel behaviour in a range of lifestyle contexts, including travel for work, leisure and holidays. Through a series of questionnaire and focus groups analyses with the public, the research examines the links between...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/07/2008 - 30/09/2009
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
The population under study: (1)for the stage 2 quantitative survey: residents living in five electoral wards in Devon in Autumn 2008 selected by systematic random sampling: Pennsylvania, Polsloe, St. Loyes, Crediton St. Lawrence and Cullompton North; (2) for Stage 1 focus groups: residents living in these five electoral wards selected by convenience sampling in June and July 2008; (3) for stage 3 focus groups, volunteer respondents from the questionnaire survey from all five wards;(4) for the in-depth interviews, volunteer respondents from the questionnaire survey. The data collection consists of: The three stages of the primary data collection: (1) 10 focus group transcripts in individual MS Word files (two each from the five study locations). A total of 71 participants were involved with these groups; (2) 1 SPSS data file (with attendant coding in the ‘Variable View’) for the questionnaire survey of 1561 participants covering all five sample locations; (3) 5 focus group transcripts in individual MS Word files (one each for the five study locations). A total of 21 participants were involved in these groups. In addition, 5 in-depth interviews were undertaken with participants to the questionnaire, one in each study location.
Funding information
Grant number
RES-061-25-0158
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2015
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.