The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
End Line Evaluation of the Project Sister for Sister's Education-II, 2021
Creator
Silwal, R, Foundation for Development Management
Study number / PID
854969 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854969 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Sisters for Sisters' Education II (SfSE-II) project is funded by Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office’s Girls’ Education Challenge Transition Window (GEC T) and builds on the achievements of phase I (2013 – 2017). The project was implemented by the VSO in Nepal with the British Council as resource partner and Mercy Corp as the technical partner in four districts of Nepal: Dhading, Lamjung, Parsa, and Surkhet. Foundation of Development Management (FDM) conducted a longitudinal evaluation of the project, of which FDM was part of the midline and endline evaluation. Here, the FDM is submitting the quantitative data of the end-line evaluation gathered through the Household and Girls’ Survey. The project stands on three major components: learning, transition, and sustainability. To supplement these outcomes, five intermediate outcomes, namely, attendance, self-esteem and empowerment of the girls, parental engagement in girl’s education, teaching quality and gender-responsive school management and governance, were developed. In addition to these pre-developed components, inquiry on the impact of COVID-19 was carried out among the girls. Data concerning these outcomes, intermediate outcomes and the impact of the pandemic were collected through girls’ and household surveys. Due to the limitation posed by the pandemic, data were collected only from the treatment schools. The dataset of the girls and households survey has been attached herein along with a codebook to ensure further clarity on the dataset.Sisters for Sisters' Education II (SfSE-II) project is funded by Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office’s Girls’ Education Challenge Transition Window (GEC T) and builds on the achievements of phase I (2013 – 2017). Through improved access to quality education, SfSE-II envisioned that marginalized adolescent girls from rural Nepal will transition from basic to secondary education, and secondary to upper secondary, empowered to leave school to either secure a...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
06/12/2020 - 18/12/2020
Country
Nepal
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Household
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Data collection for the endline evaluation of Sister for Sister's Education project, phase II was conducted using a sequential mixed-method research method. For quantitative data collection, household survey and girl's survey were conducted among the treatment schools and for qualitative data collection, KII and FGD with concerned stakeholders were conducted in all four project districts.The Household Survey was conducted among 549 households and Girls' Survey in 535 girls of the treatment school. Based on the MEL framework which stated that a sample size of 521 in-school treatment girls would be a statistically significant number for conducting difference-in-difference analysis i.e measure mean the difference between two independent groups (with 261 from comparison group). This, the sample size was calculated using G*Power using t-test with an effect size of 0.25 sd, α = 0.05 (Confidence level at 95%) and power of 0.95 (95%). The purposive sampling technique was adopted for the qualitative sampling. The respondents for the KII and FGDs included in-school girls, community members and parents, headteachers, focal teachers, local government officials, and focal teachers. For the end-line evaluation, 48 KII which was done among key stakeholders such as the headteachers, focal trained teachers, Big Sisters, Municipal Education Officers, and headteachers from comparison schools, and 56 FGDs were conducted with major stakeholders such as the Little Sisters, Non-Little Sisters, EDGE club members, parents from treatment and comparison schools.
Funding information
Grant number
7042
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.