The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Television framing of the 2014 Scottish independence referendum - Part 3: Coding of news sources
Creator
Dekavalla, M, University of Stirling
Study number / PID
852458 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852458 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
This dataset contains the coding of the sources that appeared or were openly referenced in all news items about the 2014 Scottish independence referendum which were broadcast on BBC Reporting Scotland between 18 August and 18 September 2014. The file records the name of each source, the duration of their appearance or quotation, their gender, the side they supported in the referendum, the source category they belonged in (elite official; expert; non-elite official; unofficial; confidential; unaccounted), whether they were interviewed or paraphrased; whether they were identified by name or in generic terms; whether they were used once or multiple times in the same item; and whether they proposed new arguments or responded to someone else's. The news programmes themselves are available from the broadcaster. These data complement the interview dataset and the frame analysis dataset by showing which sources were used in the news coverage, and were therefore given explicitly the opportunity to promote their own frames of what the referendum was about. The other two datasets(See Related resources below) explore which frames were present in the coverage and how these frames emerged based on the experiences of broadcasters and their political and civil society sources.On 18 September 2014, the Scottish electorate will be called to answer a fundamental question about the future of the UK and Scotland: the decision of whether Scotland will become an independent state or remain a part of the UK will have an impact not only on the relationship between the British nations but also on other parts of Europe with similar concerns. Yet, as is the case with any contested issue, the definition of what this referendum is about will be negotiated between political and social groups, debated in the media and deliberated by voters before making their decision. Is the referendum a competition between two opponents fighting for the vote? Is it a matter of identity (shared or...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2015 - 31/10/2016
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Text unit
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
All the items specified above were watched and coded for the sources that appeared or were mentioned during each programme. The categories into which sources were classified were as follows. Elite official sources: political and state institutions, official political campaigns, major corporate, business and economic organisations, major NGOs, celebrities, royalty, news agencies and other news media. Non-elite official sources: smaller non-profit and non-governmental organisations (charities, voluntary organisations, associations, societies, communities), interest, activist and pressure groups, trade unions, small businesses. Experts: academics and scientists, observers and specialists, analysts, think tanks, former politicians, former public officials. Unofficial sources: ordinary people, voters, workers (lower level staff), vox populi, survey respondents, protesters, demonstrators, rioters, hecklers, observers and participants in unusual activities. Confidential sources: unnamed, e.g. according to 'well-informed sources'.