Summary information

Study title

Television framing of the 2014 Scottish independence referendum - Part 3: Coding of news sources

Creator

Dekavalla, M, University of Stirling

Study number / PID

852458 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852458 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

This dataset contains the coding of the sources that appeared or were openly referenced in all news items about the 2014 Scottish independence referendum which were broadcast on BBC Reporting Scotland between 18 August and 18 September 2014. The file records the name of each source, the duration of their appearance or quotation, their gender, the side they supported in the referendum, the source category they belonged in (elite official; expert; non-elite official; unofficial; confidential; unaccounted), whether they were interviewed or paraphrased; whether they were identified by name or in generic terms; whether they were used once or multiple times in the same item; and whether they proposed new arguments or responded to someone else's. The news programmes themselves are available from the broadcaster. These data complement the interview dataset and the frame analysis dataset by showing which sources were used in the news coverage, and were therefore given explicitly the opportunity to promote their own frames of what the referendum was about. The other two datasets(See Related resources below) explore which frames were present in the coverage and how these frames emerged based on the experiences of broadcasters and their political and civil society sources.On 18 September 2014, the Scottish electorate will be called to answer a fundamental question about the future of the UK and Scotland: the decision of whether Scotland will become an independent state or remain a part of the UK will have an impact not only on the relationship between the British nations but also on other parts of Europe with similar concerns. Yet, as is the case with any contested issue, the definition of what this referendum is about will be negotiated between political and social groups, debated in the media and deliberated by voters before making their decision. Is the referendum a competition between two opponents fighting for the vote? Is it a matter of identity (shared or...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/01/2015 - 31/10/2016

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Text unit

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

All the items specified above were watched and coded for the sources that appeared or were mentioned during each programme. The categories into which sources were classified were as follows. Elite official sources: political and state institutions, official political campaigns, major corporate, business and economic organisations, major NGOs, celebrities, royalty, news agencies and other news media. Non-elite official sources: smaller non-profit and non-governmental organisations (charities, voluntary organisations, associations, societies, communities), interest, activist and pressure groups, trade unions, small businesses. Experts: academics and scientists, observers and specialists, analysts, think tanks, former politicians, former public officials. Unofficial sources: ordinary people, voters, workers (lower level staff), vox populi, survey respondents, protesters, demonstrators, rioters, hecklers, observers and participants in unusual activities. Confidential sources: unnamed, e.g. according to 'well-informed sources'.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/L010062/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2016

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available