The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Sustainable and Holistic Food Chains for Recycling Livestock Waste to Land, 2005-2007
Creator
Chadwick, D., North Wyke Research
Study number / PID
6327 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-6327-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This is a mixed method dataset. The study is part of the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme.
The project aimed to determine if current livestock and manure management practices, attitudes to microbial pollution and decision making represented a risk of pathogen transfers to watercourses from farms. It sought to make recommendations which would reduce those risks, and to estimate the costs and wider benefits accrued.
An important methodological innovation in the development of both field- and farm-scale risk assessment tools was the use of expert judgments to establish values for different drivers of Faecal Indicator Organisms (FIO) risk, be they socio-economic (income, infrastructure, knowledge) or physically (source, transfer, connectivity) based risk factors. Through the development of the field-scale risk tool, it concluded that of the fields surveyed in the catchment, the majority fell within the negligible and low risk category. The season accommodating the highest proportion of ‘very high’ risk fields was found to be summer (4%) whereas autumn, spring and summer were all ranked as having the lowest proportion (2%) of seasonal ‘very high’ risk.
The farm scale risk tool was designed to indicate the likelihood of FIO loss from farm enterprises and to highlight key attributes of the farm system contributing to FIO loss. The 4 key risk components were conceptualised as: accumulating microbial burden to land, landscape transfer potential, infrastructural characteristics of the enterprise, and social and economic obstacles to taking action. Understanding how the four components interact to influence risk is key to effective microbial risk assessment on the farm.
Further information for this study may be found through the ESRC Research Catalogue webpage: Sustainable and Holistic Food Chains for Recycling Livestock Waste to Land.Main Topics:Livestock farms in the Taw Catchment,...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/05/2006 - 01/12/2007
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Farms
Individuals
Subnational
Universe
Extensive survey - 77 livestock farms (dairy, sheep, beef and poultry) in the Taw Catchment. Expert elicitation - 28 academic and policy experts with natural and social background. Field data - raw data of water quality and FIO counts in 12 locations in the Taw Catchment.