The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
TRUST: Tracing Risk and Uncertainty in Security Technology: Interview Transcripts
Creator
Bourne, M, Queen's University Belfast
Lisle, D, Queen's University Belfast
Johnson, H, Queen's University Belfast
Degenhardt, T, Queen's University Belfast
Hayward, K, Queen's University Belfast
Study number / PID
851646 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-851646 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Interviews with scientists and engineers, as well as with end-users, relating to the development of a handheld Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) detector. We followed the patterns of communication, interaction and negotiation between engineers, end-users and others. This enabled the development of a deep understanding of how security technologies are developed. We produced new cross-disciplinary knowledge through engagement between social scientists and engineers, and developed new insights in the intersections of politics, sociology, and Science and Technology Studies. This research maps and analyses how new security technologies are developed in practice through inter-disciplinary collaborative research between social scientists and engineers. It will contribute to cross-disciplinary and applied knowledge about the drivers and challenges of science and technology in relation to defence and security needs. It studies the HANDHOLD project (an integrated portable Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive detection device) that involves nine partners including engineering companies, academics, and end-users from five EU countries.
This project explores how these different contexts affect the management of risk and uncertainty in the development of security technologies. It examines how different understandings of risk and security interact in processes of technology development, how risks and uncertainties are negotiated and managed, and how the risk of failure and the security context shape the complex creative enterprise of technology development. The methods employed include analysis of key documents; observation of scientists and engineers in action, and interviews with key participants in different agencies.
The research will produce a number of reports and workshops for government and other stakeholders as well as high quality academic publications. It will offer important lessons for technology development,...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/03/2013 - 31/10/2014
Country
United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany (October 1990-), Estonia, Portugal
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Organization
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Semi-structured interviews with scientists and engineers and end-users at their institutions and laboratories.