The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Spatial Planning and the Future of Public Service Professional Labour: Focus Groups, 2018
Creator
Tait, M, University of Sheffield
Study number / PID
854987 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-854987 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The Working in the Public Interest Project sought to understand shifts in the UK planning profession. A core strand of the project was to develop an understanding of the current position of the UK Planning Profession, and in particular to understand the relative roles of the private and public sector in this activity. To achieve this, the Project conducted 8 Focus Groups composed of professional planners across the UK (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). The key aim was to generate knowledge of the current state of planning with respect to a range of different issues: outsourcing, the nature of work in each sector, public leadership and attitudes towards the public interest. This generated insights that were written up as Field Reports for 8 Focus Groups of professional planners. Additionally, a 'State of the Nation' Report was co-authored with the Royal Town Planning Institute and derived directly from the focus group material. The collection contains three elements: 1) Anonymised transcript of 6 focus groups (the other 2 are not available); 2 Focus Group reports for all 8 focus groups, which includes transcribed direct quotes and findings from the focus groups; Published report arising from the focus groups 'Serving the Public Interest? The reorganisation of UK planning services in an era of reluctant outsourcing'.This study proposes the first major investigation in the UK into the increasing involvement of private companies in carrying out professional spatial planning work formerly conducted by local government.
In the postwar era, decisions about urban development were justified with the idea that state-employed planners served a unified public interest. As politically-neutral bureaucrats working in government, they stood above particular interests to serve a common good. Although this 'public interest' justification has long been challenged it remains important for professional practice. However, over the last 20 years organisational...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
04/04/2018 - 29/06/2018
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Group
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Focus groups of planning professionals were organised by the research team in collaboration with the Royal Town Planning Institute. 8 locations for focus groups were selected to provide a geographical coverage through the UK: Cardiff, Belfast, London, Edinburgh, London (for professionals working in the South East of England, Leeds, Leicester, Bristol. The Royal Town Planning Institute distributed an invitation to all its members to attend the focus groups in the regions/nations. Additionally, professional networks of the 3 university planning schools involved in the project (Sheffield University, Newcastle University, UCL) were used to supplement invites. The focus groups were open to any professional planner. Between 5 and 14 planners attended each group. Focus groups lasted approximately 2 hours. These were convened by a lead researcher with support from one or two further researchers. All focus groups were recorded with full participant consent of all attendees. Focus group audio recordings were transcribed by a professional transcription service and anonymised. Reports were written summarising each focus group, and a UK wide report written to summarise key findings of all focus groups.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/P011713/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.