Summary information

Study title

Focus Groups with Healthcare Professionals and Patients about Visual Aids in Ambulatory Clinical Practice/Experience, 2017-2021

Creator

Hafner, C, Geneva University Hospitals

Study number / PID

855201 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-855201 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

This study aims to explore how visual aids (VA) are used in ambulatory medical practice. Our research group (two doctors, one graphic designer and one sociologist) have led a qualitative study based on Focus Groups. A semi-structured guide and examples of VA were used to stimulate discussions. Participants were healthcare professionals (HP) working in ambulatory practice in Geneva and French-speaking outpatients. After inductive thematic analysis, the coding process was analyzed and modified to eventually reach consensus. Six focus groups gathered twenty-one HP and fifteen patients. Our study underlines the variety of purposes of use of VA and the different contexts of use allowing the distinction between “stand-alone” VA used out of consultation by patients alone and “interactive” VA used during a consultation enriched by the interaction between HP and patients. HP described that VA can take the form of useful tools for education and communication during consultation. They have questioned the quality of available VA and complained about restricted access to them. Patients expressed concern about the impact of VA on the interaction with HP. Participants agreed on the beneficial role of VA to supplement verbal explanation and text. Our study emphasizes the need to classify available VA, guarantee their quality, facilitate their access and deliver pertinent instructions for use.This study aims to explore how visual aids (VA) are used in ambulatory medical practice. Our research group (two doctors, one graphic designer and one sociologist) have led a qualitative study based on Focus Groups. A semi-structured guide and examples of VA were used to stimulate discussions. Participants were healthcare professionals (HP) working in ambulatory practice in Geneva and French-speaking outpatients. After inductive thematic analysis, the coding process was analyzed and modified to eventually reach consensus. Six focus groups gathered twenty-one HP and fifteen patients. Our...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

26/07/2017 - 24/05/2021

Country

Switzerland

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Group

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

We conducted a qualitative study based on focus groups. Following a review of the literature, a guide to a semi-structured focus group (FG) was established in order to stimulate discussion. The interview guide (see Table 1) was validated in a pilot FG. Given the absence of modification to the guide, the pilot FG was included in the analysis. The interviews were recorded and transcripted after participants' agreement and anonymized.

Funding information

Grant number

Unknown

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2022

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.

Related publications

Not available