The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Post primary education and training program Uganda, classroom data 2013-2014
Creator
Seidman, E, New York University
Raza, M, New York University
Kim, S, New York University
Study number / PID
852610 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852610 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This dataset contains data collected using the TIPPS environmental scan and 18 items focused on classroom processes and teacher practices. Using the TIPPS (Teacher Instructional Practices and Processes System - a systematic classroom observation instrument) Ugandan classrooms were observed in 2013-2014.
This data provides a unique opportunity to further develop and validate an innovative, affordable, scalable, and practically useful tool for assessing teacher practices and classroom processes. It also has the potential to provide feedback to teachers, especially when used in tandem with mentoring and reflected practice for improved teacher performance. We conduct a series of scientific studies to assure the viability, validity, and utility of this instrument. In addition to the development and validation of an effective classroom observational instrument, we want to assure its use in policy and practice in Uganda and eventually in other low-income and fragile states. Worldwide, there has been growing interest in understanding the nature of quality education. A major key to this quest lies in what goes on inside classrooms, where children derive the bulk of their daily experiences in academic and social learning. While factors like the physical condition of the school building, textbooks, and teacher degrees play a role in children's learning and life outcomes, they are small and indirect.
Teacher instructional practices and classroom processes, in terms of supportiveness and organization, play considerable roles in children's learning and well being outcomes. Yet, the focus of many attempts to improve (and evaluate) educational programs has been based on classic, though simple, input-output model. In other words, an intervention takes place, and then the change in child academic or social outcomes are measured. Studies of this type can be viewed as "black box" studies; they tell us little more than whether the program worked or not. They fail to provide us with...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2013 - 31/12/2014
Country
Uganda
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Event/process
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
TIPPS data was collected towards the end of 7th (Senior 1; S1) and 8th (Senior 2; S2) grades (2013, 2014) in Ugandan secondary schools. Pairs of raters were sent to each school to observe approximately 4 classrooms per day/shift. Which classrooms observed was dependent on school schedules and observer availability. Under standard conditions, the observation protocol specified the following order to selection procedures for classroom observation: a) choose a Language (English or Kiswahili) or Math class, followed by Biology in Senior 2 (S2) (if multiple classes are available, enumerator chooses randomly); b) if no classes for “a” are available then choose any other classroom-based subject (e.g., geography, commerce, religion) in S2; c) if no classes for “b” are available then choose Language (English or Kiswahili) or Math, followed by Biology in S1 (if multiple are available, enumerator chooses randomly); and d) if no classes for “c” are available enumerator choose any other classroom-based subject in S1. Overall, 371 and 366 classrooms were observed in 2013 and 2014, respectively. It should be reiterated that while schools were the same in 2013 and 2014, the classrooms and subject matter observed were not always the same.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/M004740/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.