The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Good germs, bad germs: A participatory model for mapping the domestic microbiome 2016-2017
Creator
Lorimer, J, University of Oxford
Study number / PID
853055 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853055 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
New developments in the natural sciences show the great diversity of microbial life in our bodies, homes and the wider environment. This work requires us to rethink what it means to be human and hygienic. Some germs are risky, but the life in and around us also keeps us healthy. There is a growing interest in ‘probiotic’ approaches to health and hygiene that can differentiate between good and bad germs. We want to bring these scientific developments out of the laboratory to explore how they relate to everyday understandings of domestic life and kitchen hygiene. Using in-depth, semi-structured interviews, this project recruited 14 households in Oxford to ask them about their relationship with the microbes in their home, especially in the kitchen. A first round of interviews were carried out in March 2016, and a final round of exit interviews were carried out in July 2017. The project also generated significant amounts of genomic 16S data, which has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive.Humans are riddled with life. Our bodies, homes and cities support myriad microbial biodiversity. These are generally thought of as disease-causing 'germs' that should be eradicated. But recent developments in metagenomics - the sequencing of genetic material taken from the environment - have begun to reveal the ubiquity and functional importance of the 'human microbiome': the microbial life in, on and around us. Metagenomics helps identify extensive changes in these hitherto invisible worlds with possible implications for human health. Some, like allergy, autoimmunity and antibiotic resistance, have been linked to modern hygiene practices.
There is a growing popular and policy interest in the microbiome, and the possibilities of more nuanced or 'probiotic' ways of living with germs. To date however there has been limited public engagement with the science and technology of metagenomics and its potentially transformative means of representing the microbiome. This...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
11/01/2016 - 30/11/2017
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Household
Text unit
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
The methodology used to create this data collection was in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with 14 households in Oxford. First interviews were carried out in March 2016, and Exit Interviews in July 2017. Recruitment: Participants were recruiting using a series of posters, flyers and community newsletters to recruit 14 households. All applicants were screened through an initial questionnaire, to check that they were willing to commit for the duration of the project, to rule out anyone with a health condition that could be exacerbated through taking part, and to identify prior levels of microbiological expertise. First Interviews: These interviews involved semi-structured interviews with each household, averaging around 45 minutes in duration, and were mostly conducted in the participants’ own homes with at least two research-staff present at all times. Paricipants were asked about ‘bacteria’, ‘microbes’ and ‘germs’ – what they thought these terms meant, how they visualised them, and what kinds of associations they brought to mind. They were also asked how they used their kitchens – as places to cook and eat, to work and socialise, and what cleaning routines they had.Exit Interviews: The project concluded with another round of in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews, conducted in a similar manner to those at the beginning of the project. The interview revisited questions around participants’ understandings of microbial life, their hygiene practices in the kitchen, and also their reflections on the project.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/N006968/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2018
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.