Summary information

Study title

Good germs, bad germs: A participatory model for mapping the domestic microbiome 2016-2017

Creator

Lorimer, J, University of Oxford

Study number / PID

853055 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-853055 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

New developments in the natural sciences show the great diversity of microbial life in our bodies, homes and the wider environment. This work requires us to rethink what it means to be human and hygienic. Some germs are risky, but the life in and around us also keeps us healthy. There is a growing interest in ‘probiotic’ approaches to health and hygiene that can differentiate between good and bad germs. We want to bring these scientific developments out of the laboratory to explore how they relate to everyday understandings of domestic life and kitchen hygiene. Using in-depth, semi-structured interviews, this project recruited 14 households in Oxford to ask them about their relationship with the microbes in their home, especially in the kitchen. A first round of interviews were carried out in March 2016, and a final round of exit interviews were carried out in July 2017. The project also generated significant amounts of genomic 16S data, which has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive.Humans are riddled with life. Our bodies, homes and cities support myriad microbial biodiversity. These are generally thought of as disease-causing 'germs' that should be eradicated. But recent developments in metagenomics - the sequencing of genetic material taken from the environment - have begun to reveal the ubiquity and functional importance of the 'human microbiome': the microbial life in, on and around us. Metagenomics helps identify extensive changes in these hitherto invisible worlds with possible implications for human health. Some, like allergy, autoimmunity and antibiotic resistance, have been linked to modern hygiene practices. There is a growing popular and policy interest in the microbiome, and the possibilities of more nuanced or 'probiotic' ways of living with germs. To date however there has been limited public engagement with the science and technology of metagenomics and its potentially transformative means of representing the microbiome. This...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

11/01/2016 - 30/11/2017

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Household
Text unit

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

The methodology used to create this data collection was in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with 14 households in Oxford. First interviews were carried out in March 2016, and Exit Interviews in July 2017. Recruitment: Participants were recruiting using a series of posters, flyers and community newsletters to recruit 14 households. All applicants were screened through an initial questionnaire, to check that they were willing to commit for the duration of the project, to rule out anyone with a health condition that could be exacerbated through taking part, and to identify prior levels of microbiological expertise. First Interviews: These interviews involved semi-structured interviews with each household, averaging around 45 minutes in duration, and were mostly conducted in the participants’ own homes with at least two research-staff present at all times. Paricipants were asked about ‘bacteria’, ‘microbes’ and ‘germs’ – what they thought these terms meant, how they visualised them, and what kinds of associations they brought to mind. They were also asked how they used their kitchens – as places to cook and eat, to work and socialise, and what cleaning routines they had.Exit Interviews: The project concluded with another round of in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews, conducted in a similar manner to those at the beginning of the project. The interview revisited questions around participants’ understandings of microbial life, their hygiene practices in the kitchen, and also their reflections on the project.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/N006968/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2018

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available