The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
A theoretical and experimental examination of perceived expertise and dishonesty 2017-2018
Creator
Grimshaw, S, University of Exeter
Fonseca, M, University of Exeter
Study number / PID
853472 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853472 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
There are two data sets in relation to the two experiments conducted under the research. The first contains actual scores and declared scores in a self-reported laboratory pen and paper maths test under three treatment conditions with different information about the performance of other students. The second contains scores from on-line quiz conducted with some questions geared towards subjects area of expertise, and other questions geared away from it. The main research questions were to test if experimental evidence supported a model of lying containing a reference point to reflect a cost of lying in terms of a deviation from credibility as well as in terms of the size of lie. The tests were conducted in relation to an experiment whereby a reference point was set exogenously through social information (experiment 1) or endogenously through a subject's degree of perceived expertise (experiment 2). Good tax design and administration are central to the functioning of the economy. Taxes are important determinants of economic behaviour, and good implementation can significantly increase economic and social welfare. The role of the Tax Administration Research Centre is to deliver research that enhances tax policy and provides lasting benefit to the economy. There are many research tools that can contribute to this goal but the greatest success will be achieved by combining a range of research methodologies and disciplines.
The Centre will unite researchers from two institutions with distinguished reputations for research into tax administration and tax design. Complementary abilities and methodologies will be brought together to address a wide range of intersecting research projects. The research methodologies will include economic modelling, econometric analysis, experimentation, numerical simulation, and qualitative analysis. In undertaking its work the Centre will make extensive use of the HMRC/HMT Datalab to permit innovative empirical work to be undertaken.
Some...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2017 - 31/08/2018
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
Experiment 1: 9 sessions of up to 32 subjects recruited from the University of Exeter undergraduate subject pool invited to the laboratory. Experiment conducted using pen and paper.Experiment 2: 180 subjects studying economics or history from Exeter, Royal Holloway, York, Essex and Nottingham invited to take part the experiment through the laboratory booking systems at the respective universities. Experiment conducted on-line through bespoke system.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/K005944/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.