The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Jelušič, Ljubica (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Defence Research Centre)
Malnar, Brina (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre)
Study number / PID
SJM052 (ADP)
URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADPSJM052 (NUK)
https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM052_V1 (doi)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Slovene Public Opinion Survey
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in over fifty consolidated and emerging democracies. The goals of this unique program of research are threefold: illuminate how electoral institutions constrain the beliefs and behaviours of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections; understand the nature of political and social cleavages and alignments; and shed light on how citizens, living under diverse political arrangements, evaluate...
The survey is a part of all-European project which intention is to annotate social changes in certain time period. Thematically the survey is focused on attitudes towards national and international security. The questionnaire is composed out of six parts. The first part contains questions about safety threats. The second block is asking about safety culture and includes questions about behaviour in case of armed aggression, attitudes towards citizenship education as school subject and legitimate reasons for military force use. The next complex of questions is about Slovenia's safety system, role in preservation of sovereignty and independence, military's role in international cooperative missions. The fourth part of questionnaire is asking questions about Europe's safety integrations. Respondents evaluate the degree of trust in certain international institutions and attitudes towards EU and NATO membership. These are followed by questions concerning military profession. At the end we can find some questions concerning current political themes and media. This is followed by extensive demographic block which concludes with questions by which respondents evaluate their characteristics. Comparative surveys: ADP - IDNo: SJM941, ADP - IDNo: SJM945, ADP - IDNo: SJM951, ADP - IDNo: SJM962, ADP - IDNo: SJM991, ADP - IDNo: SJM992, ADP - IDNo: SJM013, ADP - IDNo: SJM033.The survey is a part of all-European project which intention is to annotate social changes in certain time period. Thematically the survey is focused on attitudes towards national and international security. The questionnaire is composed out of six parts. The first part contains questions about safety threats. The second block is asking about safety culture and includes questions about behaviour in case of armed aggression, attitudes towards citizenship education as school subject and legitimate reasons for military force use. The next complex of questions is about Slovenia's safety system, role in...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
17/03/2005 - 25/04/2005
Country
Slovenia
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Institutionalised people.
Sampling procedure
Probability: Cluster: Stratified random
Kind of data
NumericNumeric
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)
Access
Publisher
Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.