The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Qualitative Interview Data From "Beyond 'Left Behind Places'" Project, 2021-2024
Creator
MacKinnon, D, Newcastle University
Velthuis, S, Newcastle University
Pike, A, Newcastle University
Tomaney, J, University College London
Study number / PID
857447 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-857447 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
These are transcripts from qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted as part of the project "Beyond 'Left Behind Places': Understanding Demographic and Socio-economic Change in Peripheral Regions in France, Germany and the UK". The interviews were conducted in the two UK case study areas that were part of the project: Bishop Auckland and its surrounding villages in County Durham, and Walsall in the West Midlands. The aims of these interviews were: to understand the experiences and perceptions of local residents of these two areas, and to get a sense of the local policy and practice in the areas in terms of regeneration and service delivery (skills, housing, health, community services, etc.). Residents often reported a sense of place attachment and belonging, but many perceived that the two areas had both experienced a degree of decline over past decades, particularly in terms of a diminished retail and hospitality offer and the withdrawal of some services, particularly in more rural parts of the Bishop Auckland area. Trust in national politicians and policymakers was low, but views of local politicians were more mixed. In terms of policy responses, the two areas had differing strategies, with Bishop Auckland being more focused on a tourism- and heritage-led regeneration strategy (alongside retail developments and investment in infrastructure) whereas in Walsall there was an emphasis on brownfield redevelopment into both industrial/commercial property and housing, as well as investment in creative industries, (digital) skills, and community and voluntary sector organisations.Social and spatial inequalities between and within core and peripheral regions have re-emerged as a major economic and political issue in developed economies. Such divisions have generated economic and social discontent and growing levels of political support for populist and nationalist parties in peripheral regions, particularly certain old industrial areas. This turmoil fuelled the...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/03/2021 - 30/08/2024
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Organization
Household
Geographic Unit
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Semi-structured interviews with two groups of participants: 1) residents, 2) institutional stakeholders (local government officers and elected members, senior staff in education, housing, health, community and voluntary sector).Residents were accessed either in public spaces, e.g. local libraries and cafes, or via community organisations (e.g. during coffee mornings at local community hall). Efforts were made to sample residents in roughly representative proportions to local population in terms of gender, age group, and ethnic group (a sampling frame for residents is included in the data collection).Institutional stakeholders were sampled on the basis of desk research indicating key local organisations and/or individuals involved in local regeneration and service delivery. A degree of snowball sampling was also used.Participant information sheets and consent forms are included for reference, as is the thematic interview guide used for the resident interviews. An interview guide for stakeholder interviews is not included since the interview topics/questions varied quite substantially depending on the stakeholder.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/V013696/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.