Summary information

Study title

Qualitative Interview Data From "Beyond 'Left Behind Places'" Project, 2021-2024

Creator

MacKinnon, D, Newcastle University
Velthuis, S, Newcastle University
Pike, A, Newcastle University
Tomaney, J, University College London

Study number / PID

857447 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-857447 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

These are transcripts from qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted as part of the project "Beyond 'Left Behind Places': Understanding Demographic and Socio-economic Change in Peripheral Regions in France, Germany and the UK". The interviews were conducted in the two UK case study areas that were part of the project: Bishop Auckland and its surrounding villages in County Durham, and Walsall in the West Midlands. The aims of these interviews were: to understand the experiences and perceptions of local residents of these two areas, and to get a sense of the local policy and practice in the areas in terms of regeneration and service delivery (skills, housing, health, community services, etc.). Residents often reported a sense of place attachment and belonging, but many perceived that the two areas had both experienced a degree of decline over past decades, particularly in terms of a diminished retail and hospitality offer and the withdrawal of some services, particularly in more rural parts of the Bishop Auckland area. Trust in national politicians and policymakers was low, but views of local politicians were more mixed. In terms of policy responses, the two areas had differing strategies, with Bishop Auckland being more focused on a tourism- and heritage-led regeneration strategy (alongside retail developments and investment in infrastructure) whereas in Walsall there was an emphasis on brownfield redevelopment into both industrial/commercial property and housing, as well as investment in creative industries, (digital) skills, and community and voluntary sector organisations.Social and spatial inequalities between and within core and peripheral regions have re-emerged as a major economic and political issue in developed economies. Such divisions have generated economic and social discontent and growing levels of political support for populist and nationalist parties in peripheral regions, particularly certain old industrial areas. This turmoil fuelled the...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/03/2021 - 30/08/2024

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization
Household
Geographic Unit

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

Semi-structured interviews with two groups of participants: 1) residents, 2) institutional stakeholders (local government officers and elected members, senior staff in education, housing, health, community and voluntary sector).Residents were accessed either in public spaces, e.g. local libraries and cafes, or via community organisations (e.g. during coffee mornings at local community hall). Efforts were made to sample residents in roughly representative proportions to local population in terms of gender, age group, and ethnic group (a sampling frame for residents is included in the data collection).Institutional stakeholders were sampled on the basis of desk research indicating key local organisations and/or individuals involved in local regeneration and service delivery. A degree of snowball sampling was also used.Participant information sheets and consent forms are included for reference, as is the thematic interview guide used for the resident interviews. An interview guide for stakeholder interviews is not included since the interview topics/questions varied quite substantially depending on the stakeholder.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/V013696/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2024

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available