The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Co-operation or Contest? Inter-Agency Relationships in Police Custody Areas, 2007
Creator
Skinns, L., University of Cambridge, Darwin College
Study number / PID
6283 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-6283-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This is a mixed methods data collection.
Since the 1980s, police custody areas have become multi-professional contexts involving solicitors, 'appropriate adults', forensic medical examiners and drug workers. Increasingly, they also involve members of the extended police 'family', i.e. civilians appointed as detention officers and custody officers and employed either by the police or private security companies. Previous research has shown that multi-professional partnerships can involve a mixture of co-operation and contest due to different occupational cultures, working practices, organisational priorities and levels of power and status. Therefore the aim of this research was to examine how these various police custody workers co-operate with each other, and the impact (if any) on detainees' access to the services they require and their experiences of police custody. In addition, the research examined how the police custody process has been affected, if at all, by civilianisation and privatisation and the implications for governance and accountability. The research compared two police custody areas, with similar levels of throughput (c.12,000 custody episodes per year); one site, in a London borough, was predominantly publicly run, and the other, in a city in the South-East of England, was predominantly privatised. Further information on methodology can be found in the study user guide.
The dataset comprises 22 interviews with detainees and 28 interviews with staff, across the two research sites. The quantitative file comprises custody record data for 883 cases during the research period, across the two sites.
Users should note that, while the qualitative interview transcripts are available to registered users, the quantitative custody record data file included in this study is currently subject to conditional access, in that it requires agreement from the depositor before individual access...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/02/2007 - 01/09/2007
Country
England
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Subnational
Universe
Professionals and detainees in two police custody areas, one privatised and one publicly run, in South East England and London respectively.
Sampling procedure
Case studies
Kind of data
Numeric
Semi-structured interview transcripts; quantitative data
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Telephone interview
Compilation or synthesis of existing material
Semi-structured interview transcripts; quantitative data collected from police custody records
Funding information
Grant number
RES-000-22-1719
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2009
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.