The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Edtech in Higher Education: Focus Groups, Database, and Documents on Edtech Companies, Investors and Universities, 2021-2023
Creator
Komljenovic, J, Lancaster University
Sellar, S, University of South Australia
Hansen, M, University of Cambridge
Study number / PID
856729 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-856729 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
These data were generated as part of a two-and-a-half-year ESRC-funded research project examining the digitalisation of higher education (HE) and the educational technology (Edtech) industry in HE. Building on a theoretical lens of assetisation, it focused on forms of value in the sector, and governance challenges of digital data. It followed three groups of actors: UK universities, Edtech companies, and investors in Edtech. The researchers first sought to develop an overview of the Edtech industry in HE by building three databases on Edtech companies, investors in Edtech, and investment deals, using data downloaded from Crunchbase, a proprietary platform. Due to Crunchbase’s Terms of Service, only parts of one database are allowed to be submitted to this repository, i.e. a list of companies with the project’s classification. A report offering descriptive analysis of all three databases was produced and is submitted as well. A qualitative discursive analysis was conducted by analysing seven documents in depth. In the second phase, researchers conducted interviews with participants representing three groups of actors (n=43) and collected documents on their organisations. Moreover, a list of documents collected from Big Tech (Microsoft, Amazon, and Salesforce) were collected to contextualise the role of global digital infrastructure in HE. Due to commercial sensitivity, only lists of documents collected about investors and Big Tech are submitted to the repository. Researchers then conducted focus groups (n=6) with representatives of universities (n=19). The dataset includes transcripts of focus groups and outputs of writing by participants during the focus group. Finally, a public consultation was held via a survey, and 15 participants offered qualitative answers.The higher education (HE) sector has been marketised for decades; but the speed, scope, and extent of marketisation has led key education scholars to conceptualise it as a global industry (Verger,...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2021 - 29/06/2023
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Organization
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
In the first phase, three databases were constructed by downloading data on Edtech companies, investors and investment deals from Crunchbase. The databases include all countries as per Crunchbase availability, and data from 1990. A descriptive overview of the Edtech industry was produced based on these databases. A qualitative discursive analysis was conducted to accompany the qualitative analysis by analysing documents produced by investors from the UK and the USA, an Edtech market intelligence company, and a news item reporting on interviews with international investors in Edtech. In the second phase, case studies were built that included 8 universities based in the UK, 14 companies operating in the UK and abroad, and 28 investors operating globally. 43 interviews were conducted altogether, and 2,498 documents were collected. Moreover, a document analysis of 331 documents by Big Tech from the USA and their role in HE was conducted. In the fourth phase, focus groups were conducted that included 19 participants from UK universities. Mentimeter was used to allow participants to collectively post answers to questions to prompt the discussion. All focus groups were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were anonymised and all content that could indicate any individual or institutional identity or commercial sensitivity was redacted. Finally, a public consultation was conducted by a survey with qualitative answers. 15 participants answered, who are from Australia, Belgium, Netherlands, Ireland, South Africa, UK and USA.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/T016299/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2023
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.