Study title
Social and Job Market Policy Aspects of Advancing the Flexible Age Limit to the 60th Year of Age
Creator
Blume, Otto (Institut für Sozialforschung und Gesellschaftspolitik, Köln )
Nägele, Gerhard (Institut für Sozialforschung und Gesellschaftspolitik, Köln )
Plum, Wolfgang (Institut für Sozialforschung und Gesellschaftspolitik, Köln )
Study number / PID
ZA1004, Version 1.0.0 (GESIS)
Data access
Information not available
Abstract
Attitude of older employees in North Rhine-Westphalia to advancing the
flexible age limit to the 60th year of age for men or the 58th year of
age for women. The current job situation and ideas about life in
retirement.
Topics: commuting time to work; participation in retraining and
measures for further education; change of job within the company and
reasons for this change; expected influence of age on the last change
of job; financial losses from this; judgement on job security and one´s
own occupational future; work satisfaction; characterization of job
demands; relationship with colleagues; assessment of personal condition
of health; contacts with doctors; frequency of illness and
disabilities; ideas about retirement; assumed pleasant and unpleasant
aspects of retirement; experiences of friends or relatives with the
time in retirement; assessment of the financial situation after
retirement; assessment of the desired retirement age of colleagues;
frequency of use of the flexible age limit in the company and assumed
reasons for this; personal interest in utilization of the flexible age
limit; planned further employment after reaching the age limit;
attitude to earlier retirement with corresponding reduction in pension
or increase in retirement insurance contributions; evaluation of
various recommendations on improvement in the situation of older
employees; preferred reduction in working hours; assumed attitude of
company management to advanced retirement; lay-off actions and
redundancy payments scheme in the company; monthly financial burdens.
Demography: age; sex; age of spouse; marital status; religious
denomination; school education; occupational training; occupational
position; occupation of spouse; income; composition of household;
housing situation; degree of urbanization; city size; length of
employment.
Interviewer rating: length of interview and difficulties with
interview.
Additionally encoded was: district code.