Summary information
Study title
Eurobarometer 63.1 (Jan-Feb 2005)
Creator
European Commission, Brussels; DG Communication Public Opinion Analysis Sector
Study number / PID
ZA4233, Version 1.1.0 (GESIS)
10.4232/1.10965 (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the standard
Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on their opinions
regarding science and technology, social values, and services of
general interest.
Topics: Questions concerning the first topic focused on the
respondents´ attitudes toward science and technology issues including
what areas they were most interested, how informed respondents were in
general, and recent visits to a museum of science and technology or
another type of public museum. Other questions measured respondents´
level of trust in science, their views on the role science and
technology should have in improving the economy, the potential benefits
or harmful effects of science, and the role the European Community
plays in scientific research. Another topic covered was social values
in relation to science and technology. Respondents were asked how often
they thought about the meaning and purpose of life, about their
spiritual beliefs, what kind of family they grew up in, how often they
trusted other people, how satisfied they were with their lives, whether
a university education is more important for a man than for a woman,
and whether men make better political leaders than women. The surveys
also solicited respondents´ opinions with respect to developing
technologies (including solar energy, biotechnology, genetic
engineering, the Internet, nanotechnology), and possible applications
of science and technology over the next 20 years (such as cloning
monkeys or pigs for use in research into human diseases or cloning
human beings so that couples can have a baby even when one partner has
a genetic disease). Respondents were queried on their opinions about
humanity´s relationship to nature, what decisions about science and
technology should be based primarily on, how important they thought
science and technology would be for their society in ten years´ time,
and if what those who are involved in science and technology do has a
positive...
Read moreTopics
Keywords
Methodology
Data collection period
03/01/2005 - 17/02/2005
Country
France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Denmark, Ireland, United Kingdom, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Finland, Sweden, Austria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Croatia, Iceland, Switzerland, Norway
Time dimension
Not availableAnalysis unit
Not availableUniverse
Not availableSampling procedure
A multi-stage, random (probability) sampling design was used for this
Eurobarometer. In the first stage, primary sampling units (PSU) were
selected from each of the administrative regionals units in every
country (Statistical Office of the European Community, EUROSTAT NUTS 2
or equivalent). PSU selection was systematic with probability
proportional to population size, from sampling frames stratified by the
degree of urbanization. In the next stage, a cluster of starting
addresses was selected from each sampled PSU, at random. Further
addresses were chosen systematically using standard random route
procedures as every Nth address from th initial address. In each
household, a respondent was drawn, at random, following the closest
birthday rule. No more than one interview was conducted in each
household. They were supposed to have sufficient command of one
of the respective national language(s) to answer the questionnaire.
Separate samples were drawn for Northern Ireland and East Germany.
Kind of data
Not availableData collection mode
Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire
Access
Publisher
GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences
Publication year
2012
Terms of data access
0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Related publications
Not available