The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Survey of Ghanaian Lecturers on Teaching Critical Thinking, 2021-2022
Creator
McCowan, T, University College London
Adu-Yeboah, C, University of Cape Coast
Kwaah, C, University of Cape Coast
Rolleston, C, University College London
Study number / PID
856905 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-856905 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The ‘Building capacity for critical thinking enhancement in African Higher Education’ project focused on impact enhancement and capacity building, on the basis of the findings from the initial research grant ‘Pedagogies for critical thinking: innovation and outcomes in African higher education’. It was therefore not primarily focused on generating new evidence. Nevertheless, a small amount of data was collected through the process of monitoring impact, in the form of a survey of participating academic staff which comprised both quantitative and qualitative data collection exercises at small scale. This data collection followed capacity building workshops in three universities in Ghana for developing strategies for incorporating critical thinking into their educational programmes. All three universities held staff development workshops and established ongoing support for lecturers.Critical thinking is widely acknowledged as being key to individual capabilities and the development of societies. Ghana and other African countries are in great need of graduates with highly developed critical thinking skills, so as to address the challenges of poverty reduction, democratic governance and environmental sustainability. While universities have great potential for developing critical thinking, to do so effectively they need a conducive learning environment. Evidence from our earlier study 'Pedagogies for critical thinking: innovation and outcomes in African higher education' showed that there was unevenness between institutions, but that some were facilitating rapid improvements. The most significant factors were seen to be lecturers' orientation towards a 'facilitation' rather than 'transmission' approach, a shared collaborative culture in departments, and flexible assessment regulations.
Building on these findings, this project aims to enhance impact on universities in Ghana and beyond. Through reflexive workshops with academic staff on a cascade model, it enhances the...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2021 - 31/12/2022
Country
Ghana
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
There were two forms of data collection, a questionnaire and an individual interview. An online questionnaire was distributed to 25 lecturers in four universities, in addition to members of senior management, and teaching and learning units in the same institutions. A total of 63 responses were achieved. The questionnaire focused on change in participants’ pedagogical approaches linked to their participation in the project and also to broader change taking place in their institutional environment and wider context. It comprised primarily questions gathering a range of attitudinal and experiential data. Questions were also included to address issues of barriers to and enablers of change plus understandings of required assumptions needed for successful pedagogical change. Owing to the small scale of the study, however, it was not appropriate to conduct formal inferential statistical analyses. The data was used to examine indicative trends and to gain insight into participants’ responses to the project and into their evolving pedagogical approaches. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with a small number of participants with the aim of exploring their experiences of the project and of pedagogical change in greater depth. These were carried out with 11 participants in three of the universities.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/V001094/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.