The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Teaching and Learning Processes in Inner City Infant Schools, 1992
Creator
West, A., London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Educational Research
Sammons, P., University of London, International School Effectiveness and Improvement Centre
Study number / PID
3760 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-3760-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.There were five key objectives to this research project :
to examine the teaching approaches experienced by year 2 pupils in inner city schools since the introduction of the national curriculum and assessment;
to examine how Teacher Assessments (TAs) and Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs) were being carried out in English, Mathematics and Science, with particular attention being focused on bilingual children and children with special educational needs and where they were not being carried out, to establish why;
to compare the learning outcomes of pupils in inner-city schools and examine how such outcomes are related to background factors at the level of the individual pupil;
to investigate whether there is any evidence that particular teaching and learning approaches benefit certain kinds of learning outcomes and/or particular groups of children;
to examine children's attitudes towards teaching and learning and where possible to relate these to teachers' expectations and pupils' learning outcomes.Main Topics:The topics covered include :
Key Stage 1 data LEA data : students' year, term and month of birth, English language fluency, Key Stage 1 English, Mathematics, Science and Technology subject testing data, gender, eligibility for free school meals, Statements of Special Educational Needs.
Headteacher questionnaire : years as headteacher, number of pupils with Statements, percentage of pupils with other educational needs, pupils' socio-economic backgrounds by percentage of those from non-manual, skilled and semi-skilled manual, unemployed households; percentages of pupils from refugee, traveller and lone parent families; percentages of pupils not fluent in English language, whether mobility of pupils due to family movement causes problems for school, parent interest and involvement in pupils' education including parent helpers, changes in school population, reading schemes and methods and book...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
Not available
Country
England
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Institutions/organisations
Subnational
Schools
Teachers
Universe
Teachers and pupils in inner city infant schools spread across four inner London local education authorities.
Sampling procedure
Purposive selection/case studies
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Postal survey
Compilation or synthesis of existing material
From the Key Stage 1 data, common pupil background variables were created where possible from those provided by each LEA. Only these together with the subject level and profile component data for each pupil were then matched to the head teacher questionnaire responses for the corresponding school.
Funding information
Grant number
R000233949
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
1998
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.
Related publications
Westlake, A., Hind, A. and Sammons, P. (1997) 'Accounting for variations in pupil attainment at the end of Key Stage 1', British Education Research Journal, 489–511