The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), English Pilot Study on Non-Cognitive Skills
Creator
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Study number / PID
ZA6940, Version 1.0.0 (GESIS)
10.4232/1.13062 (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
This online survey was designed to test the measurement properties of nine personality scales – the Big Five, Traditionalism, Self-Control, Self-Efficacy, Honesty/Integrity, Socio-Emotional Skills, Intellectual Curiosity, Job Orientation Preferences and Vocational Interests. Eight of these nine scales are existing scales (or combinations of scales) available for use in public domain. The scale assessing socio-emotional skills was developed by an expert group. The complete formulations of items from all the scales including the different forms/test conditions of the scales are presented in the data documentation.
Simplified scales
Based on the work of members of the expert group, simplified versions of original scales were developed (see data documentation). This was done in order to make the wording of the original scales more appropriate for use with general adult population (in many cases the original items were perceived as possibly too complex and abstract for less literate members of general population).
Not all items have simplified versions since in some cases the original formulations were seen by the expert group as suitable for the target population. This is especially the case in the Job Orientations, Integrity/Honesty and Vocational Interests’ scales as well as the entire Intellectual Curiosity scale. In total, there are 174 original items and 130 simplified or reversed versions of the items.
Neutral/middle point
In addition to comparing scales containing the original and simplified items, the second main design feature of this online survey was the use of a neutral/middle point in the Likert scales (agree/disagree). In particular, there were two versions of each original and simplified scale – one with 5 agree/disagree response options, including a “neither agree nor disagree” neutral/middle category and another with 4 response options, which did not include the option of “neither agree nor disagree”. This was done in order to see which of the two...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
06/2016 - 07/2016
Country
United Kingdom, United States of America
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Not available
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Non-probability: Quota
Non-probability Sample: Quota Sample
Around 8,000 complete responses were collected in the first phase and around 2,000 in the second phase. Some 25% of respondents were excluded from the data base after failing to meet various quality control criteria - country of residence, age, testing time, ability test, consistency of answers, and answers on quality control questions. Thus, in the final sample there are 4,957 US respondents 953 UK respondents in the first phase and additional 1,606 US respondents in the second phase.
The sample was a convenience sample and is unrepresentative of the populations of the US and UK. Quotas were used to ensure a gender, age and regional distribution that broadly represented census data in the US and UK. These desired gender distribution was not achieved as there are somewhat more women than men in both the US and UK samples.
Survey implementation
The survey was conducted in two phases:
In the first phase, each respondent was randomly assigned to one of the four test conditions (as indicated above, Socio-emotional skills and Vocational interest scales have slightly modified test conditions):
Condition A: Original scales with neutral response option
Condition B: Original scales without neutral response option
Condition C: Simplified scales with neutral response option
Condition D: Simplified scales without neutral response option
Apart from the nine personality scales, all other scales were assigned to all respondents, including the ability test which was administered as the last scale in the survey.
In the second phase, three groups of respondents (around 500 in each group) were administered different sets of personality scales under all four test conditions. In particular, the first group of respondents were assigned the Big Five questionnaire with 60 items in four conditions, representing 240 items in total (plus all other additional variables and ability test). The second group were administered the Traditionalism, Self-Control, Self-Efficacy and Socio-Emotional skills scales (54 items) in all four conditions (216 items in total). The third group was administered the Integrity/Honesty, Job orientations and Vocational Interests scales (54 items) in all four conditions as (216 personality items).
The second phase was added to the project in order to complement the between-subject design of the first phase with a within-subject design, in order to identify scale and item properties across different conditions in a more straightforward manner.
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview)The survey was conducted online. The Survey was implemented using the Survey Monkey platform.
Access
Publisher
GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences
Publication year
2018
Terms of data access
C - Data and documents are only released for academic research and teaching after the data depositor's written authorization. For this purpose the Data Archive obtains a written permission with specification of the user and the analysis intention.