Summary information

Study title

Quantitative and qualitative explanations of electoral change in rural and urban India Part 1: Tamil Nadu 2016, Assembly election post poll survey

Creator

Heath, O, Royal Holloway, University of London

Study number / PID

852560 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852560 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This collection contains the survey conducted in Tamil Nadu during the 2016 Assembly elections. The survey was conducted after voting but before the results were announced. The survey was carried out by Cicero. Respondents were asked to evaluate the characteristics of different candidates contesting the election. As part of this grant we carried out two surveys. Part 1 provides details about the survey carried out in Tamil Nadu, which primarily focuses on candidate evaluations. Part 2 provides details about the survey carried out in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh which primarily focuses on public service evaluations (for Part 2, see Related Resources) .

The network intends to compare politics in Indian cities and villages by studying state and local elections, quantitatively as well as qualitatively. It will ask whether voters are moving from identity-related to issue-based motivations - in cities if not in villages - and hypotheses that the changing profile of elected representatives - including MLAs - reflects an ongoing social democratisation process in spite of the development of local dynasties and the resilience of patronage. The network will bring into conversation researchers in different social science disciplines, employing different methodologies to demonstrate the complementarity of survey-based and ethnographic approaches to studying elections.

Topics

Methodology

Data collection period

16/05/2016 - 19/05/2016

Country

India

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

1. Sample ACs using the Systematic Random Sampling Method. 2. Sample 3 Polling Stations within the sampled ACs using the Systematic Random Sampling Method. 3. Sample 21 respondents from the latest ERs within each of the 3 Polling Stations of all sampled ACs using the Systematic Random Sampling Method.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/K005936/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2017

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available