The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Optimising care delivery models to support ageing-in-place 2015-2018
Creator
Huang, J, School of Architecture, University of Sheffield
Hadjri, K, School of Architecture, University of Sheffield
Study number / PID
853182 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853182 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This is a mixed methods project conducted in China, UK and France to gather information about older people’s experiences within their home environment and the assistive technologies used to support them so that to assess the feasibility of proposed recommendations for age-friendly housing environments.
This collection consists of survey, focus group and interview data. Each bundle belongs to one work package in the ODESSA project. All deposited data were collected by the ODESSA UK research team.
There are in total 6 different work packages in the ODESSA project. WP1 & WP6 were funded by NSFC of China, WP2 & WP5 by ANR France and WP3 & WP4 by ESRC UK. WP1 used CHARLS longitudinal surveys while WP2 used SHARE and ELSA longitudinal surveys. They did not generate new data only some analysis to inform WP6. WP5 conducted scoping studies on reverse mortgage, Viager and PPP and did not generate new datasets. WP6.1 produced a prediction model based on the CHARLS data. The UK team was responsible for WP3 & WP4 and for project management. WP6.2 was a new addition to the project once the team realised that WP6 could have a qualitative (WP6.2) and a quantitative (WP6.1) contribution.
The access information to the CHARLS, SHARE and ELSA datasets is provided in the related resources list and the notes on access.Population ageing has been recognised for some time in European countries like UK and France. However, this has been acknowledged in China only recently but with more urgency due to the tremendous population size and predicted growth; China will have 64 older people for every 100 workers by 2025. China presents what is, in effect, a different ageing trajectory from European countries, and has unique characteristics shaped by its distinct historical, cultural, economic and political contexts. Recent demographic changes and significant economic transformations have led China to move from a traditional familial dominated elder system of care in which older people are...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/03/2015 - 28/02/2018
Country
United Kingdom, China, France
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Group
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
The methods used in the data collection include questionnaire surveys, focus groups, interviews. WP3: A mixed methods approach was employed. A survey instrument was developed to collect a range of personal, accommodation and connection data. Qualitative data to provide additional information on perceived enablers and barriers was collected through focus groups.WP4: Focus groups were conducted in China, UK and France to gather information about older people’s experiences within their home environment and the assistive technologies used to support them so that to assess the feasibility of proposed recommendations for age-friendly housing environments. Interview with Chinese stakeholders (academic researchers and practitioners) were also carried out to understand older people’s housing choices as well as establish physical design factors, challenges and potentials of residential design for older people.WP6 Part 2: Based on the research findings in the ODESSA project, twelve scenarios were developed. Two public events were held in Beijing to collect people's scaled evaluation feedbacks on the plausibility and robustness, importance, value, optimism and acceptance of these scenarios. Comments were also collected for qualitative analysis.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/L016095/1 & ES/L016095/2
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.