The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
The organization, financing and management of cultural education services and institutions in Germany is extraordinarily heterogeneous. Responsibilities for public funding are distributed not only across the federal levels, but also across various departments at the federal, state and local levels. In addition, other agencies of the indirect state administration, but also cultural and social associations (...) are sometimes involved in the processing of funding. In addition, foundations, funding associations and public (...) or private companies often contribute to financing at the local and national level. In extracurricular cultural education, part of the costs of the program is usually covered by participation fees.
Financing and the associated control of the use of funds are the central foundations for a systematic, coordinated and targeted control (...) of cultural education. The diversity of funding sources and the widespread use of mixed funding therefore leads directly to the question of how and to what extent targeted control and planning of cultural education is implemented in practice.
The aim of the survey of the 200 direct member cities of the German Association of Cities was to gain meaningful and reliable insights into the main types of funding and management practices in the field of cultural education.
A total of 104 member cities of the German Association of Cities took part in the survey, in which a total of around 22 million citizens lives. The study focused on the municipalities as the main organizers and financiers of cultural education. Accordingly, the key questions were how cultural education is organized and coordinated in the cities, to what extent concepts and networking open up additional scope for funding, what contribution different sources of funding make, and what developments are expected with regard to the budget for cultural education.
The survey was conducted as a standardized online survey. The questionnaire comprised...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
15/06/2016 - 15/08/2016
Country
Germany
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Organization/Institution
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
All 200 direct member cities of the German Association of Cities were contacted. This is a full survey of all - direct - members, including all independent cities and the city states of Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen.
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Access
Publisher
GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
A - Data and documents are released for academic research and teaching.