Study title
Competitive City and Urban Policy : Modelling Discretionary Grant Allocation in the UK, 1994-1998
Creator
Study number / PID
4446 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-4446-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.
The aim of the research was to examine the relative contribution of need, bid-quality and political factors to the success of bids made to the Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) programme in England between 1994 and 1997. 1196 bid documents were collected from archive and other sources. Each was subjected to content analysis to measure numerous aspects of bid quality, after suitable checks of the coding frame and inter-coder reliability. Each bid was given a score on a set of need variables ultimately derived from Census data. Finally each bid was given a score on a set of political variables, reflecting how important the area the bid came from was electorally, and the ability of local MPs to lobby on behalf of the bid. Tobit regression models were built to explain variation in this, depending on need, bid-quality and political factors.
Main Topics:
The dataset contains information on 1196 bids - close to the universe of bids made over the four rounds of bidding studied. Four main groups of variables exist: measures of success/failure, derived from official records of the process; measures of bid quality, derived from the content analysis; measures of need, derived from census data; and measures of political factors relating to the bid. There are also case identifiers and some information on the local government units and electoral districts from which the bid was mounted.
Topics
Keywords
Methodology
Data collection period
Not availableCountry
Time dimension
Analysis unit
Universe
The unit of analysis is an individual bid. These were mounted by bidding groups which comprised some combination of local authorities, local business groups, voluntary sector groups and regional groupings of these entities. Bids were made between the financial years 1994/5 and 1997/8, and pertain to various locations in England.
Sampling procedure
Kind of data
Data collection mode
Funding information
Grant number
L130251038
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2001
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.