Summary information

Study title

Ideologies in Social Inquiry Reports, 1974

Creator

Hardiker, P., University of Leicester, School of Social Work

Study number / PID

444 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-444-1 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The purpose of this study was to identify probation officers' ideologies of crime and to describe the aims and factors which are associated with the different recommendations probation officers make in their social inquiry reports.

Main Topics:

Variables
a) Structured Questionnaire
Probation officers' role in the courts, functions in social inquiry reports and observations about punishment and treatment in sentencing. Aims and factors in different recommendations. Likert scale, including statements about explanations for offence behaviour.
b) Standardised Social Inquiry Reports
Six 'mock' social inquiry reports were given to respondents. Likely and preferred recommendation aims and factors which seemed relevant in each case.
c) Sample of Actual Social Inquiry Reports
Nature of report, details of the offence and circumstances, motivational accounts, Likert scale, decision-making processes in recommendation, aims and factors in recommendation decisions, sentence.
d) Large Sample of Recommendations
Data from records on: agency, probation officer, court, sex of offender, recommendation and disposition.

Methodology

Data collection period

01/05/1974

Country

England

Time dimension

Cross-sectional (one-time) study

Analysis unit

Probation officers
Individuals
Groups
Text units (documents/chapters/words)
Subnational

Universe

Probation Officers, their recommendations and social inquiry reports in England

Sampling procedure

1. Stratified sample of probation officers from selected agencies
2. Five social inquiry reports from each officer, representing the last report they had prepared in which recommendations for: conditional discharge, fine, probation, custody or no-recommendation respectively had been made
3. Reports from two agencies

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Face-to-face interview
Compilation or synthesis of existing material

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

1979

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.

Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.

Related publications

Not available