The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Fancourt, D., University College London, Department of Behavioural Science and Health
Bu, F., University College London, Department of Behavioural Science and Health
Paul, E., University College London, Department of Behavioural Science and Health
Steptoe, A., University College London, Department of Behavioural Science and Health
Study number / PID
9001 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-9001-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The UCL COVID-19 Social Study at University College London (UCL) was launched on 21 March 2020. Led by Dr Daisy Fancourt and Professor Andrew Steptoe from the Department of Behavioural Science and Health, the team designed the study to track in real-time the psychological and social impact of the virus across the UK.
The study quickly became the largest in the country, growing to over 70,000 participants and providing rare and privileged insight into the effects of the pandemic on people’s daily lives. Through our participants’ remarkable two-year commitment to the study, 1.2 million surveys were collected over 105 weeks, and over 100 scientific papers and 44 public reports were published.
During COVID-19, population mental health has been affected both by the intensity of the pandemic (cases and death rates), but also by lockdowns and restrictions themselves. Worsening mental health coincided with higher rates of COVID-19, tighter restrictions, and the weeks leading up to lockdowns. Mental health then generally improved during lockdowns and most people were able to adapt and manage their well-being. However, a significant proportion of the population suffered disproportionately to the rest, and stay-at-home orders harmed those who were already financially, socially, or medically vulnerable. Socioeconomic factors, including low SEP, low income, and low educational attainment, continued to be associated with worse experiences of the pandemic. Outcomes for these groups were worse throughout many measures including mental health and wellbeing; financial struggles;self-harm and suicide risk; risk of contracting COVID-19 and developing long Covid; and vaccine resistance and hesitancy. These inequalities existed before the pandemic and were further exacerbated by COVID-19, and such groups remain particularly vulnerable to the future effects of the pandemic and other national...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
21/03/2020 - 22/03/2022
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Longitudinal/panel/cohort
Analysis unit
Individuals
National
Universe
The UCL COVID-19 Social Study is a large panel study of the psychological and social experiences of over 70,000 adults (aged 18 and over;) in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sampling procedure
Purposive selection/case studies
Convenience sample
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Funding information
Grant number
WEL/FR-000022583
Grant number
ES/S002588/1
Grant number
221400/Z/20/Z and 205407/Z/16/Z
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee.