The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Aid Salary Discrepancies and Development Workers' Performance, 2007-2010
Creator
Carr, S., Massey University, School of Psychology
Study number / PID
6610 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-6610-1 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.A veritable elephant in the parlour of poverty reduction efforts, is the salary gap that often exists between aid workers, whether national or expatriate, volunteer or expert, or among local personnel working for different agencies. This research aimed to document the extent of such salary discrepancies; explore their consequences for work performance; and determine the potential for salary alignment and harmonisation to boost co-operative work performance; build capacity; and effectively address poverty reduction challenges.
According to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, best practice in aid work means pay should be aligned and harmonised across worker groups (World Bank, 2005). Although pay may not be a primary motive for development workers, discrepancies in pay nonetheless have the potential to influence perceptions of organisational justice, which can in turn affect work performance. Moreover, because injustice is a motivation for much aid itself, perceptions of unfairness in aid work may have an inherent salience and undermine its necessary constituents, especially co-operation and mutual capacity-building.
This interdisciplinary, multi-method project explored the effects of aid salary discrepancies in the health, education and business sectors of six countries: the landlocked economies of Malawi and Uganda; the transition economies of India and China; and the island economies of the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea. Bringing together an international team of psychologists, sociologists, management experts, educationalists, and economists from 10 different countries this project focused on the human dynamics of aid salary discrepancies and their significance for capacity building in lower-income countries.
Further information, including publications, can be found at the project's website or funding award web page
Main Topics:The main topics covered dual...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
Not available
Country
China, India, Malawi, Papua New Guinea, Uganda, Solomon Islands
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Cross-national
National
Universe
Professional development workers in six low-to middle-income countries, across landlocked, Island and emerging economies: Malawi, Uganda, India, China, the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea during 2007-2010
Sampling procedure
Quota sample
One-stage cluster sample
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Self-completion
Psychological measurements
Funding information
Grant number
RES-167-25-0169
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2011
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is to be made available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.