Summary information

Study title

Anti-Microbials in Society - Uganda Study, 2017-2021

Creator

Naiga, S, IDRC
Nabirye, C, IDRC
Kayendeke, M, IDRC
Chandler, C, LSHTM

Study number / PID

854612 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-854612 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

The AMIS Project Uganda is an anthropological research project aimed at better understanding the use of antimicrobials in Ugandan society. The study used a mixed-methods approach to investigate the roles and context of antimicrobials in daily life in Tororo, Wakiso and Kampala districts from the perspective of health care providers, farmers and day wage urban workers. The data collection includes field-note and contact summaries, in-depth interview transcripts, key informant interview transcripts, medicines surveys, oral histories, and participant feedback dialogues.Our use of antibiotics has escalated. We are often most aware of antibiotic use when we treat infections - for people, and animals. However, their use is more widespread. We use them routinely to reduce risks of infection amongst people with vulnerable immune systems, in farming livestock, to manage infection and to promote growth and even in crop farming. This widespread use is linked to a rise in antibiotic resistance (AMR). The amount of antibiotic chemicals in circulation is held responsible for driving selection pressure amongst bacteria such that some infections become untreatable with previously effective drugs. This can have dramatic consequences for both health and economics. And yet, scientists have emphasised the lack of evidence for using antibiotics in many scenarios. For example, it is estimated that at least 50% of human antibiotic usage has no clinical benefit. Policy makers are agreed that we must reduce our reliance on these medicines. But how? Efforts to change end user behaviour are often called for but thus far have not had the widespread impacts required to curb the emergence and spread of resistance. In this research, we propose that antibiotics are embedded within our socioeconomic infrastructure in such a deep way that attempts simply to change behaviour of patients, physicians of farmers are peripheral to our underlying dependency on their use. We suggest that by...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/05/2017 - 31/08/2021

Country

Uganda

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization
Household

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text

Data collection mode

This study used an observational mixed-methods research design. Fieldwork was conducted in blocks of 6-10 weeks over a period of 24 months between 2018 and 2021. This included: 1) 51 semi-structured interviews with key informants, including healthcare providers, farmers and day-wage workers to understand how antibiotics are intertwined in people’s lives; 2) 12 stakeholder interviews with policy makers, public health practitioners, regulators, consumer groups, NGOs, and researchers to better understand AMR policies and initiatives; 3) long-term participant observation with 73 individuals; 4) Medicines surveys involving 609 participants to capture and explore patterns of antibiotic use for humans and animals. In total, 733 individuals were engaged during fieldwork across the three sites. The semi-structured interviews were based on pre-defined topic guides to investigate the ways in which antimicrobials enable particular ways of life and livelihoods, as well as the wider reasons for antimicrobial use in Uganda. Participants were identified using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques to enrol a wide range of stakeholders related to antimicrobial use. Following informed consent, the interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed and translated into English. In addition to ethnographic fieldwork, documentary analysis was conducted to identify relevant public health literature, policy documents, and media materials, to contextualise ethnographic findings. Participatory research activities were also conducted to elicit preliminary feedback on findings from research participants. This included 10 feedback dialogue events, engaging 123 individuals.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/P008100/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2021

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.

Related publications

Not available