The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Anti-microbials In Society - Thailand, Study 1, 2017-2021
Creator
Sringernyuang, L, Mahidol University, Thailand
Whanpuch, P, Mahidol University, Thailand
Poompruek, P, Mahidol University, Thailand
Chandler, C, LSHTM
Study number / PID
855071 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-855071 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
The AMIS Project Thailand is an anthropological research project aimed at better understanding the role of antimicrobials in daily life in Thai society in diverse contexts and with different actors, including health care providers, day wage urban workers, scientists and policy-makers. The research focuses on the ways in which antimicrobials enable particular ways of life, livelihoods and institutional practices, and explores the context and the wider motivations for antimicrobial use in Thailand. Specifically, it focusses on access to antimicrobials in community pharmacies in Thailand, the transmission of antimicrobial resistant infection in bedridden patients, and the impact of rational drug use policies.Our use of antibiotics has escalated. We are often most aware of antibiotic use when we treat infections - for people, and animals. However, their use is more widespread. We use them routinely to reduce risks of infection amongst people with vulnerable immune systems, in farming livestock, to manage infection and to promote growth and even in crop farming. This widespread use is linked to a rise in antibiotic resistance (AMR). The amount of antibiotic chemicals in circulation is held responsible for driving selection pressure amongst bacteria such that some infections become untreatable with previously effective drugs. This can have dramatic consequences for both health and economics. And yet, scientists have emphasised the lack of evidence for using antibiotics in many scenarios. For example, it is estimated that at least 50% of human antibiotic usage has no clinical benefit.
Policy makers are agreed that we must reduce our reliance on these medicines. But how? Efforts to change end user behaviour are often called for but thus far have not had the widespread impacts required to curb the emergence and spread of resistance. In this research, we propose that antibiotics are embedded within our socioeconomic infrastructure in such a deep way that attempts simply to...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/07/2017 - 31/08/2021
Country
Thailand
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Organization
Family
Household
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
Ethnographic fieldwork was conducted between August 2018-November 2020 and included qualitative interviews, focus groups, participant observation, a household drug survey, and health facility mapping. A total of 89 semi-structured and informal interviews were conducted with 47 informants. Informants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy designed to include stakeholders with a range of roles and perspectives on antimicrobial use in Thailand. Interviews were conducted face-to-face or remotely online or via telephone and lasted between 40-60 minutes. Three focus group discussions were conducted with community health volunteers, working age and elderly residents, recruited via the sub-district health promoting hospital. Participant observation was conducted in two privately-owned community pharmacies and with 27 bedridden patients and their relatives. A household drug survey was conducted in 95 households across three communities in the sub-district. The survey included four sections: demographic information; health status; household medicines; medicine storage. Follow-up questions were used to elicit further details about antibiotic access and use. In addition to ethnographic and survey data, key legislation and policy documents were reviewed to contextualise ethnographic fieldwork.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/P008100/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.