The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Policy-Making Processes in Cultural Policy Arena in Slovenia
Creator
Krašovec, Alenka (Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Political Science Research)
Study number / PID
KULPOL01 (ADP)
URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:KULPOL01 (NUK)
https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_KULPOL01_V1 (doi)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
Supposition of the research describes a statement that there is an imbalance of power among policy sub-arenas in policy-making processes. The research therefore seeks to establish, which policy sub-arena is the most powerful in these processes. The total amount of power of policy sub-arenas depends on their possibility to control, oversee and monopolize of factors of power. Empirical data confirm the basic supposition only partially. A question whether a possibility of control, surveillance and monopolization of certain factors of power with regard to others, is of greater importance remains unanswered. Some of the data gathered, especially those that concerns the gap between the number and degree of control, surveillance and monopolization of factors of power in the bureaucratic sub-arena along with its power in the policy-making processes of cultural policies suggest only a possibility that some factors of power are of greater importance than others.Supposition of the research describes a statement that there is an imbalance of power among policy sub-arenas in policy-making processes. The research therefore seeks to establish, which policy sub-arena is the most powerful in these processes. The total amount of power of policy sub-arenas depends on their possibility to control, oversee and monopolize of factors of power. Empirical data confirm the basic supposition only partially. A question whether a possibility of control, surveillance and monopolization of certain factors of power with regard to others, is of greater importance remains unanswered. Some of the data gathered, especially those that concerns the gap between the number and degree of control, surveillance and monopolization of factors of power in the bureaucratic sub-arena along with its power in the policy-making processes of cultural policies suggest only a possibility that some factors of power are of greater importance than others.Supposition of the research describes a statement that there is...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
05/2001 - 06/2001
Country
Slovenia
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
IndividualDeputies, ministers, representatives of interest groups, public officials
Universe
Actors that participated in policy-making process in cultural policy arena from November 1993 to November 1994.
Sampling procedure
Non-probability: Purposive
Kind of data
NumericNumeric
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Access
Publisher
Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.