Summary information

Study title

Justifying and Proving in School Mathematics: Student Conceptions and School Data, 1996

Creator

Healy, L., University of London, Institute of Education, Mathematical Sciences
Hoyles, C., University of London, Institute of Education, Mathematical Sciences

Study number / PID

4004 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-4004-1 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.In recent years there has been considerable interest in reassessing the role of mathematical proof, influenced by developments in computer technology and an increasing awareness of the role of proof in conveying and illuminating as well as verifying mathematical ideas. Research in mathematics education has shown proof to be an elusive concept for many students. This has been one influence underlying the shift away from formal methods in schools to the more process-orientated approaches now enshrined in the UK National Curriculum <i>Using and Applying Mathematics</i>. In this project a nationwide survey was conducted to ascertain the current profile of conceptions amongst 15-year-old high-attaining students of the validity of a range of modes of justification in geometry and algebra. Analysis of the survey data informed the design of two teaching experiments in these mathematical domains incorporating computer use and aiming specifically to encourage links between empirical and deductive reasoning. Case studies were constructed to evaluate the influence of these innovations on students' understanding of proving the role of formal mathematical proof. Both strands of the research contributed to the formulation of recommendations concerning the emphasis on and positioning of mathematical proof in the school curriculum.Main Topics:The study consists of two datasets: the larger dataset contains the responses of the sample of Year 10 students (14 or 15 years old) to a proof questionnaire, which comprised a question to ascertain students' views on the role of proof, followed by items in two domains of mathematics - arithmetic/algebra and geometry - presented in open and multiple-choice formats. In the open format, students were asked to construct one familiar and one unfamiliar proof in each domain. In the multiple-choice format, students were required to choose from a range of arguments...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/05/1996 - 01/07/1996

Country

England and Wales

Time dimension

Cross-sectional (one-time) study

Analysis unit

Individuals
Institutions/organisations
National
Pupils
Teachers

Universe

High-attaining Year 10 mathematics students, aged 14-15 years, and their mathematics teachers, in schools in many areas throughout England and Wales in 1996.

Sampling procedure

Convenience sample
All the students chosen were in the top mathematics sets or chosen as high-attaining by the mathematics department in their schools. Key Stage 3 test scores of the students who completed the questionnaire were provided by the schools and these ranged from Level 5 upwards with an average of 6.56.

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Educational measurements
questionnaire administered by fieldworker

Funding information

Grant number

R000236178

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

1999

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.

Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.

Related publications

  • Hoyles, C. (1997) 'A culture of proving in school mathematics?' in J. Tisley and D. Johnson (eds.), : Springer Science & Business Media, 169-182. ISBN0387352872 | 9780387352879
  • Hoyles, C. (1997) 'The curricular shaping of students' approaches to proof', For the Learning of Mathematics, 7-16
  • Hoyles, C. and Healy, L. (1998) 'Maths curriculum fails brightest students', Education Journal, 30-31
  • Hoyles, C. and Healy, L. (1999) 'Students' performance in proving:: competence or curriculum?' in I. Schwank (ed.), , Osnabrück, Germany: Forschungsinstitut für Mathematikdidaktik , 153-166. ISBN3-925386-53-X | 3-925386-50-5