Summary information

Study title

Informal finance in China 2017-2018

Creator

Deakin, S, University of Cambridge
Chen, D, University of Sheffield
Johnston, A, University of Sheffield
Wang, B, University of Cambridge

Study number / PID

853742 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-853742 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This dataset consists of transcripts and notes of interviews conducted in China between April 2017 and December 2018. The interviews were on the theme of informal finance in China and its recent transformation in the light of technological and regulatory changes. The interviewees included executives in financial and technological companies, officials, judges and lawyers.China's rapid economic growth in recent decades has been attributed to its reliance on informal contracting and trust-based relationships. This claim is a reflection of the absence in China of some of the more formal legal and regulatory institutions of the market economies of the global north. Although the claim that China lacks formal legal mechanisms of market governance may have been somewhat overstated, it is the case that informal finance, particularly in the form of trade credit, family lending and communal investing, has played a major role in supporting China's growth. The prevalence of informal finance constitutes a significance source of flexibility for China's economy given the limitations of the formal sector, which remains dominated by state-owned banks lending largely to state-owned enterprises. Informal finance is also evolving quickly and is converging with the use of internet technologies to deliver finance ('fintech') through such mechanisms as crowdfunding. However, there are downsides to the reliance of the Chinese economy on informal finance and significant risks arise from its convergence with fintech. The large shadow banking sector, by virtue of its positioning outside most of the regulations applying to mainstream banks, adds to systemic risks. The formal and informal sector coexist in an uneasy relationship: they may substitute for each other, or provide complementary modes of finance, but they can also operate to reinforce and magnify systemic risks, as in the case of the crisis in Wenzhou after 2011. Similarly, the rise of fintech is a double edged sword. On the one...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/04/2017 - 31/12/2018

Country

China

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

These are qualitative datasets are derived from interview-based fieldwork. An anonymisation log has been provided in each case.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/P004091/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2019

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.

Related publications

Not available