Summary information

Study title

Fieldwork primary research in three informal settlements in Durban, South Africa 2016-2017

Creator

Georgiadou, M, University of Westminster
Parikh, P, University College London
Bisaga, I, University College London

Study number / PID

854268 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-854268 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This collection includes files related to fieldwork activities under Phase 2 ‘Community Participation through Action Research’. The collection involves data in the form of photos, transcripts of focus group discussion and interviews with community members and external stakeholders from eThekwini municipality, spreadsheets to map anonymised responses from community events. Previous studies on in-situ upgrade of informal settlements in Durban had explored the impact of community participation on local inhabitants using case study research and ethnographic data. Phase 2, however, sought to lay the foundation for an evidence base of integrated environmental and construction management strategies (technical know-how) through engaging with community stakeholders (participatory design). Phase 2 (data in this collection) adopted a novel action research based methodology to enable participatory activities using mixed methods. This strategy ensured that the research maps the key role of community stakeholders in driving urban transformation taking into account the diversity inherent in all communities and the differences arising from age, gender, association and power differentials within them. Action research participants were community stakeholders, which include: local inhabitants; community leaders; community organisations; support NGOs; and local authorities. These actors participated in individual and group activities to discuss their experience of bottom-up upgrading strategies. Another unique aspect of the adopted methodology compared to previous studies was that it sought to empower community actors to become direct beneficiaries of the developed upgrading mechanisms, once the research is completed. Local inhabitants were not be just objects of study but acted as grassroots co-researchers, co-investigators and key agents for self-reliance co-producing knowledge and involved throughout the research process, which ultimately led to their technical, management and...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

13/02/2016 - 12/02/2020

Country

South Africa

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual
Organization
Family: Household family
Household
Housing Unit

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text
Still image
Audio
Video

Data collection mode

The focus was to produce a rich, detailed exploration of ‘best available practice’. Three studies were chosen deliberately (explicitly biased) according to the information they can provide; hence, random sampling was not be employed. With the help of uTshani Fund (NGO in Durban), this approach was investigated by the project team in the three case study sites; namely: Namibia Stop 8, Piesang River and Havelock. For the primary data, the target audience includes people involved in the bottom-up participatory upgrading of the selected case studies. Participants were households, representative members from community organisations (FEDUP, uTshani Fund), and local authorities (eThekwini municipality). The data collection methods used in Phase 2 (this collection) include: direct observations from transect walks (using photos), focus group discussions, interviews and community events. Triangulation between various methods generated a richer understanding of the bottom-up upgrading processes adopted in the case studies.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/N014006/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2021

Terms of data access

The UK Data Archive has granted a dissemination embargo. The embargo will end in March 2022 and the data will then be available in accordance with the access level selected.

Related publications

Not available