Summary information

Study title

Group‐Focused Enmity in Europe. A Representative Cross‐European Survey on Group‐Focused Enmity & Political Attitudes

Creator

Boski, Paweł (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw)
Doosje, Bertjan (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam)
Hewstone, Miles (Oxford Centre for the Study of Intergroup Conflict, University of Oxford)
Küpper, Beate (Institut für interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld)
Mayer, Nonna (Centre d´études européennes, Sciences Po)
Meertens, Roel W. (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam)
Örkény, Antal (Institute of Sociology, Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest)
Penczak, Marta (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw)
Pereira, Cícero (Institute of Social Sciences, Lisbon University)
Ramos, Alice (Institute of Social Sciences, Lisbon University)
Roux, Guillaume (Institut d´etudes politiques, University of Grenoble)
Schmid, Katharina (Oxford Centre for the Study of Intergroup Conflict, University of Oxford)
Simonovics, Bori (Institute of Sociology, Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest)
Vala, Jorge (Institute of Social Sciences, Lisbon University)
Voci, Alberto (Department of Applied Psychology, University of Padua)
Wagner, Ulrich (Fachbereich Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg)
Wolf, Carina (Institut für interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld)
Zick, Andreas (Institut für interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld)
Zimmermann, Anja (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam)

Study number / PID

ZA5166, Version 1.1.1 (GESIS)

10.4232/1.5166 (DOI)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

The aim of the research was to evaluate the extent and dissemination of prejudices against different target groups, such as migrants, ethnic and cultural minorities, Jews, Muslims, women, homosexuals, homeless people and people with disabilities, and to analyse the causes of these prejudices. In particular, it was necessary to examine similarities and differences between European countries. For this reason, both old and new EU member states were selected, which differ in integration policy, immigration history and rate as well as general prosperity. The sample includes respondents from different geographical regions in Great Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, Poland and Hungary. In each country, about 1000 people were interviewed who were representative of the citizens of the respective countries and had a minimum age of 16 years. In total, the data set contains 8026 cases. Demography: country of birth; nationality; migration background of parents or grandparents; sex; denomination; religiousness; attendance at religious services; age (grouped); marital status; long-term partner; partner is born in the country; children; highest level of education; age at the end of education; for the respondent and his partner was asked: current or former employment status; working hours per week; self-employment, employment in the public or private sector; worry about becoming unemployed; worry about partner becoming unemployed; size of household; main source of household income; household total net income; internet access in the household; number of telephone numbers in the household; willingness to participate again; consent to saving of personal data. Additionally encoded was: original national ID of respondent; country; ID of interviewer; interview date; duration of interview; interviewer ID; weighting factors; split; sex of interviewer; migration background of interviewer (not in France); generated regional information and context...
Read more

Keywords

Not available

Methodology

Data collection period

07/10/2008 - 10/12/2008

Country

United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Poland, Hungary

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Not available

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Random sample (national telephone master samples) In each household, the respondent was drawn randomly according to the Kish Selection Grid Method.

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview)

Access

Publisher

GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences

Publication year

2017

Terms of data access

C - Data and documents are only released for academic research and teaching after the data depositor's written authorization. For this purpose the Data Archive obtains a written permission with specification of the user and the analysis intention.

Related publications

Not available