The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Wolf, Carina (Institut für interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld)
Zick, Andreas (Institut für interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld)
Zimmermann, Anja (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam)
Study number / PID
ZA5166, Version 1.1.1 (GESIS)
10.4232/1.5166 (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
The aim of the research was to evaluate the extent and dissemination of prejudices against different target groups, such as migrants, ethnic and cultural minorities, Jews, Muslims, women, homosexuals, homeless people and people with disabilities, and to analyse the causes of these prejudices. In particular, it was necessary to examine similarities and differences between European countries. For this reason, both old and new EU member states were selected, which differ in integration policy, immigration history and rate as well as general prosperity. The sample includes respondents from different geographical regions in Great Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, Poland and Hungary. In each country, about 1000 people were interviewed who were representative of the citizens of the respective countries and had a minimum age of 16 years. In total, the data set contains 8026 cases.
Demography: country of birth; nationality; migration background of parents or grandparents; sex; denomination; religiousness; attendance at religious services; age (grouped); marital status; long-term partner; partner is born in the country; children; highest level of education; age at the end of education; for the respondent and his partner was asked: current or former employment status; working hours per week; self-employment, employment in the public or private sector; worry about becoming unemployed; worry about partner becoming unemployed; size of household; main source of household income; household total net income; internet access in the household; number of telephone numbers in the household; willingness to participate again; consent to saving of personal data.
Additionally encoded was: original national ID of respondent; country; ID of interviewer; interview date; duration of interview; interviewer ID; weighting factors; split; sex of interviewer; migration background of interviewer (not in France); generated regional information and context...
Many but not all metadata providers use ELSST Thesaurus for their keywords.
Keywords
Not available
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
07/10/2008 - 10/12/2008
Country
United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Poland, Hungary
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Not available
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Random sample (national telephone master samples)
In each household, the respondent was drawn randomly according to the Kish Selection Grid Method.
C - Data and documents are only released for academic research and teaching after the data depositor's written authorization. For this purpose the Data Archive obtains a written permission with specification of the user and the analysis intention.