The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Peripheral visual cues contribute to the perception of object movement during self-movement
Creator
Rushton, S, Cardiff University
Study number / PID
852880 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852880 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Safe movement through the environment requires us to monitor our surroundings for moving objects or people. However, identification of moving objects in the scene is complicated by self- movement, which adds motion across the retina. To identify world-relative object movement, the brain thus has to ‘compensate for’ or ‘parse out’ the components of retinal motion that are due to self-movement. We have previously demonstrated that retinal cues arising from central vision contribute to solving this problem. Here, we investigate the contribution of peripheral vision, commonly thought to provide strong cues to self-movement (for the publication, see Related Resources). Stationary participants viewed a large field of view display, with radial flow patterns presented in the periphery, and judged the trajectory of a centrally presented probe. Across two experiments, we demonstrate and quantify the contribution of peripheral optic flow to flow parsing during forward and backward movement.
The archived data is described in Rogers, C., Rushton, S.K. & Warren, P.A. (2017). Peripheral visual cues contribute to the perception of object movement during self-movement
iPerception, volume 8, issue 6 (see Related Resources for weblink).A long-standing question is how the brain transforms the light patterns impinging onto the retina into a meaningful world of objects and animates with which the observer can interact. While enormous progress has been made in the understanding of brain functions during the last few decades, the fundamental principles underlying the processing and extraction of visual information remain elusive. This project builds on the observation that perception has been traditionally studied in a passive manner, paying relatively little attention to the observer's motor activity during the acquisition of visual information. Yet, like other species, humans are not passively exposed to the incoming flow of sensory data. Instead, they actively seek useful...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/08/2014 - 31/10/2017
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
The methodology was psychophysics (method of constant stimuli). Participants made 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) judgements after watching a briefly presented stimulus. Each participant made 180 judgements over the course of approximately 45mins.The sample of participants consisted of undergraduate (18-21 yrs) and postgraduate (22-26 yrs) students, predominantly female, from the School of Psychology, Cardiff University. All were unaware of the experimental hypotheses, unless otherwise indicated. The participants were recruited by opportunity sampling.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/M00001X/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2017
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.