The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
AUTNES Content Analysis of ORF TV Confrontations 2013 (SUF edition)
Creator
Müller, Wolfgang C. (University of Vienna)
Bodlos, Anita (University of Vienna)
Dolezal, Martin (University of Vienna)
Eder, Nikolaus (University of Vienna)
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (University of Vienna)
Kaltenegger, Matthias (University of Vienna)
Meyer, Thomas M. (University of Vienna)
Praprotnik, Katrin (University of Vienna)
Winkler, Anna Katharina (University of Vienna)
Study number / PID
doi:10.11587/2KDUOR (DOI)
ZA5862 (GESIS ZA number)
10.4232/1.12689 (GESIS doi (Version 1.0.0))
Data access
Information not available
Series
AUTNES
Austrian National Election Study
Abstract
Full edition for scientific use. The AUTNES dataset on TV confrontations contains data collected from fifteen debates between pairs of top candidates in the 2013 national election campaign. The debates were televised by the Austrian national broadcasting company ORF between August 29th and September 24th, 2013. All statements spoken during the debates are part of the dataset. Natural sentences are the unit of analysis. The coding procedure applies the AUTNES relational approach of recording subjects, predicates, and objects to TV confrontations. The subject is defined as an actor that positions himself/herself towards an issue in the sentence. There are two types of objects: issues and object actors. The one issue that fits the content of the spoken sentence best is selected by coders from the AUTNES issue coding scheme. The issue predicate numerically records whether the subject’s position towards the issue is one of support, rejection/criticism, or conveys a neutral stance. Up to three object actors are recorded per sentence, each with their name (if an individual is present), organisational affiliation and political relevance, as well as their evaluation by the subject actor (positive, negative or neutral). In addition to the basic subject–predicate–object structure, we code character traits and party records for all subject and object actors as well as justifications for issue statements. Variables: Variables referring to the debate and coded sentence: case-ID; debate-ID; sentence-ID; sender (TV station broadcasting the debate); date of the debate; begin time and end time of the debate; duration of the debate; party affiliation and name of discussant 1 und discussant 2; name of the debate’s moderator; organisational affiliation and name of the sentence’s speaker (various actors besides the participants of the debate, i.e. journalists, experts, etc.); sentence; sentence length in words; sentence length in characters; variables referring to the subject actor:...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
29/08/2013 - 24/09/2013
Country
Austria
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Text unit
Universe
The dataset on TV confrontations holds observations for fifteen debates between pairs of top candidates. The debates were televised by the Austrian national broadcasting company ORF during the general election campaign in 2013.
All statements spoken during the debates are part of the dataset. The
basis of the analysis are transcripts provided by the Austria Press
Agency (APA).
Sampling procedure
Total universe/Complete enumeration
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Content coding
Funding information
Funder
Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Grant number
S10903-G11
Access
Publisher
The Austrian Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2021
Terms of data access
For more Information please visit AUSSDA's web page