The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
This is an interdisciplinary, inter-institutional, multi-method three-year project investigating how Brexit affects the social rights of EU & EEA nationals in the UK. It is funded by an ESRC Governance After Brexit Grant.
This data collection brings together the results of an advice-led ethnographic study and a series of stakeholder interviews. The advice-led ethnography data deposited consists of numbered case files; we have only uploaded the files for cases for which we had permission to archive the data. Each case folder contains an excel spreadsheet collating all communications – redacted transcripts of emails and summaries of phone calls and meetings. Each separate communication is in a different cell. Where advice requests were accompanied with documents, these are described in a document summary pdf, highlighting key arguments and quotes.
Where advice given was accompanied with documents that we compiled, these have been redacted and included.
The stakeholder interviews are grouped into two zip files, each containing interview transcripts as word documents. The data includes 20 parliamentary transcripts with MPs and Lords, and 9 transcripts of interviews with non-governmental organisations.
We wanted to ask: how well are EU nationals’ rights protected? Do they face administrative obstacles or discrimination when accessing public services? How are EU rights asserted (or jeopardised) in post-EU law?What does transition mean for EEA nationals in the UK? How will future uncertainty affect their ability to claim existing rights now? And will they face administrative obstacles, or discrimination when accessing public services? This project seeks to tackle these questions, to avoid the problems posed by transition from being neglected as researchers look beyond transition.
In theory, legal rights will remain mostly unchanged during transition. In practice, however, the perception and anticipation of change can create uncertainty and confusion, which...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2020 - 29/06/2023
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Event/process
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Advice-led ethnography:This is the giving of advice, and the documenting of legal and administrative issues encountered in a parallel ethnography. We set up a dedicated advice service – the EU Rights & Brexit Hub – under the auspices of the Baroness Hale Legal Clinic, based at York Law School at the University of York. It had a specific email address, to give second-tier advice to organisations working with EU/EEA nationals and their family members. We looked in particular at problems encountered when accessing public services, giving second-tier advice and drafting support to organisations working with EU nationals in the UK. By giving second-tier advice - rather than first-tier working directly with clients - we were able to have a nation-wide reach and a high turnover of cases with a focus on legal questions rather than case management. We conducted a parallel advice-led ethnography, a methodology pioneered by the EU Rights Project, documenting the cases that we encountered. These data were collated between 2020 and 2023.Semi-structured interviews:Between 2021 and 2022 we conducted two separate sets of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders in the delivery of the EU Settlement Scheme: 1.Parliamentary Stakeholders; and 2 Non governmental organisations. For (1) MPs and Lords were selected according to two criteria: estimated EU nationals as constituents, and membership of relevant parliamentary policy networks. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 of the 72 third sector organisations funded by the Home Office to support applications to the EUSS. More information is available in the Methods description document.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/S007385/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.