The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Qualitative Study of Democracy and Participation in Britain, 1925-2003: Teaching Data
Creator
Haynes, J., University of Bristol, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies
Study number / PID
6965 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-6965-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This is a qualitative teaching data collection.
Dr Jo Haynes (Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Bristol) has been using numerous data collections to support her teaching of qualitative research methods for several years. A key motivation was her desire to provide students with data, enabling more teaching time to focus on developing skills in data analysis. SN 5017 has been used in this way. This collection represents the subset of interviews specifically selected for teaching purposes.
The Qualitative Study of Democracy and Participation in Britain, 1925-2003: Teaching Data study is based on Qualitative Study of Democracy and Participation in Britain, 1925-2003 (available under SN 5017). The teaching data collection is a subset of 15 of the interviews included in SN 5017 of a subsample of the Citizens Audit, a postal questionnaire conducted by Professors Seyd and Pattie at the University of Sheffield. The participants had all indicated that they had spent more than 20 hours engaged in activities, in clubs, associations, groups, networks or in supporting other people during the last month. The data collection includes both men and women, resident in cities, towns and villages in England, Wales and Scotland.
The interviews were selected as a subset of the original data collection to represent a variety of characteristics of the participants, including age, marital status, education and gender. Selection criteria also included data quality and the ability to divide the data collection into subsamples of a manageable size (e.g. by participant characteristics, geography or other features) for student projects.
Students were then asked to write 4,000 word reports based on their analyses of these subsamples. Dr Haynes believes that the key benefits of re-using data for students are the opportunities to evaluate critically the design, execution and conclusions of the original study and...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2001 - 01/12/2003
Country
England, Scotland, Wales
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
National
Universe
A subsample of the Citizens Audit who have indicated that they have devoted more than 20 hours per month to voluntary activity in England, Wales and Scotland between 2001-2003
Sampling procedure
Simple random sample
The data collection is a subsample of the 98 interview transcripts in SN 5017 with voluntary activists selected from the Citizens' Audit (CA) (a postal questionnaire) conducted by Professors Seyd and Pattie at the University of Sheffield. The interviewees were randomly selected from 713 respondents in the CA who indicated that they had spent more than 20 hours engaged in activities, in clubs, associations, groups, networks or in supporting other people during the last month.
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2012
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.