Summary information

Study title

Six-minute Walk Test Summary Tabular Data, 2023-2024

Creator

Hughes, M, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Griffin, H, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Faulkner, J, University of Southampton

Study number / PID

857553 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-857553 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

Patients with lung disease who report breathlessness on exertion are often referred for a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). During this test patients are asked to walk up and down a corridor (or other flat area) for six minutes whilst their blood oxygen levels and heart rate are non-invasively measured using a pulse oximeter (finger probe) and the distance walked is measured. In addition, a questionnaire that obtains a Borg Score measures the patients perceived breathlessness and leg muscle fatigue both before and immediately following the test. However, because this test asks patients to walk as far as possible (a maximal 6MWT; M-6MWT), it may not reflect normal daily living. A M-6MWT, therefore, may lead to an inaccurate assessment of their requirement for ambulatory oxygen. The purpose of the project was to assess if the standard M-6MWT (as recommended by international guidelines) differed from asking patients to walk at their normal walking pace (N-6MWT). The data collected consisted of the baseline HR and SpO2 (collected via a Bluetooth pulse oximeter), along with the SpO2 nadir and peak HR during the 6MWT. The total distance walked (6MWD) and the % predicted was also recorded (using a lap counter), along with basic demographic information (verbal questioning). From these, the drop in SpO2 can be calculated and was compared between two different 6MWTs - one where the patient was asked to walk as far as possible (a maximal 6MWT; M-6MWT) or at their normal walking pace (N-6MWT). The dataset presented provides all raw and calculated data from these two tests for each participant, scored by two independent assessors (as there is some subjectivity in determining these parameters). We hypothesise that performing a N-6MWT will provide a more accurate assessment of a patients' oxygen requirement, primarily from their oxygen desaturation during the test.Patients with lung disease who report breathlessness on exertion are often referred for a 6-minute walk test (6MWT)....
Read more

Topics

Methodology

Data collection period

01/01/2023 - 01/02/2024

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Group

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text

Data collection mode

The M-6MWT was conducted in accordance with published guidelines on performing a 6MWT (Anne E. Holland et al., 2014). In brief, patients were asked to walk as far as possible in the 6 minutes whilst the number of laps completed were recorded (calculating the 6MWD). SpO2 and HR were continuously monitored throughout the M-6MWT and during a 10-minute recovery period.The N-6MWT was conducted with the same instructions as the published standardised 6MWT with the exception that participants were instructed to walk at their normal walking pace. The number of laps completed, SpO2 and HR were monitored throughout the N-6MWT. A minimum period of 10 minutes rest was provided following the test.The raw data from each test was then assigned a randomised ID and analysed blinded in a random order to remove observer bias. For each test, the SpO2 baseline, SpO2 nadir, baseline HR, peak HR and time to SpO2 nadir was manually selected from a graph that showed a continuous SpO2 and HR readout. The process was completed by two independant assessors, one within the direct research team with in depth knowledge of the test and technology used for performing the 6MWT and another an external academic collaborator with expert knowledge of the 6MWT. If values for SpO2 agreed within 1% or HR within 10bpm, only the 1st assessor result was used (as averaging would create non-integer results which for the purposes of AOT prescribing guidelines creates a non-real world result). If assessors did not agree, a third assessor was chosen and the assessor with best agreement (within 1% SpO2 or 10bpm HR) was chosen to report. The aggregate data is summarised on each respective tab in the attached summary data file.

Funding information

Grant number

Unknown

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2025

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.

Related publications

Not available