The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Domestic Homicide: Interviews with Families, Survivors and Professionals and Analysis of Domestic Homicide Reviews, 2019-2022
Creator
Chantler, K, Manchester Metropolitan University
Baker, V, Manchester Metropolitan University
Bracewell, K, University of Central Lancashire
Craig, E, Manchester Metropolitan University
Haines, A, Manchester Metropolitan University
Heyes, K, Manchester Metropolitan University
Traynor, P, Manchester Metropolitan University
Study number / PID
855879 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-855879 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This three-year ESCR-funded project aimed to address important gaps in knowledge of domestic homicide. Domestic homicide is both a global and a domestic problem that disproportionately affects women. Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) were introduced as a statutory requirement in England and Wales in 2011 to review the circumstances in which the death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence, abuse or neglect perpetrated by an intimate ex/partner, relative, or member of the same household (Home Office, 2016). The project aimed to learn from the experiences of families who had lost a relative to domestic homicide; victims/survivors of domestic abuse; professionals, and domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) to document, analyse, map, and influence policy and practice to prevent future domestic homicides. To this end the research team conducted a systematic review of domestic homicide reviews internationally to build knowledge about their focus, organisation and lessons identified in order to inform future developments of DHRs; analysed all publicly available DHRs to identify possible risk and contextual factors preceding the homicides and the recommendations made in DHRs to prevent future domestic homicides, and, explored the journeys of victim/survivors, families and agencies in relation to high risk domestic violence and domestic homicide to ensure policy and practice is cognisant of and learns from their experiences and to investigate good practice, lost opportunities for interventions and to identify areas for strengthening responses for the prevention of domestic homicides.
The total archived dataset comprises quantitative and qualitative data: 1) an SPSS database containing data from the 302 DHRs. 2) The interview transcripts with family members (n=7) who had been bereaved by domestic homicide and survivors of domestic violence (n=10) and nineteen semi-structured, audio recorded interviews (9 in Wales, 10 in Lancashire) conducted...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/05/2019 - 31/07/2022
Country
England and Wales
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Family
Family: Household family
Household
Housing Unit
Event/process
Other
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Audio
Video
Data collection mode
Data collection: The research project was made up of three work packages. For more detailed information please see the accompanying methodology document. WP 1 was a systematic literature review of international approaches to the review of domestic homicides. It is not included here but informed the rest of the project. WP 2 provided a large-scale analysis of DHRs as well as a focussed analysis of specific sub-sets which can be utilised to inform prevention and risk management of domestic abuse cases that may lead to homicide. We utilised a mixed methods approach to analyse 302 publicly available DHRs from Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) in England & Wales. WP 3 employed an experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach to interviewing some key stakeholders and gather the experiences and views of i) family members who have lost a relative to domestic homicide; ii) survivors of domestic abuse who have experienced assaults or stalking and iii) professionals involved in the DHR process. Access: Access to family members was largely through Advocacy After Fatal Domestic Abuse (AAFDA) and access to survivors of domestic violence was via Safe Net (Lancashire). Analysis: interviews were transcribed and analysed using the Listening Guide (Brown and Gilligan, 1991) which involved four sequential readings (or ‘listenings’) to attend to the different voices in the narrative and to illustrate the journeys of victims, families, good practice and lost opportunities for intervention. Braun & Clarke’s (2006) method of thematic analysis was employed across all narratives utilising NVivo for data organisation. We created three digital films and these are available at: https://domestichomicide-halt.co.uk/resource-center/ Following the analysis, and the identification of themes from interviews, a full-day event was convened with the two CSP networks to share the learning and to identify priorities for action. Outputs including policy briefings, peer reviewed journal articles, a series of films, a book of poetry based on the transcripts of survivor and family interviews were disseminated via a hybrid online and in person conference (May 2022) and on the project website (https://domestichomicide-halt.co.uk). An expanding series of peer-reviewed journal articles are also available the HALT project website.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/S005471/2
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.