The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Since 1989 national school elections have been organized in connection with municipal/county council and parliamentary elections in Norway. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data has served as a national organizer and coordinator, while the elections until 2003 were funded by Kirke-, utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet (KUF). Since 2005, Utdanningsdirektoratet has financed the school elections, and has overall responsibility for the project. For more information about school elections, see: www.samfunnsveven.no
Abstract
Since 1989 school elections have been carried out in upper secondary schools in connection with municipal and county elections. The trial elections at the upper secondary schools in Norway have gradually established long traditions. The elections play an important role in the schools' pre-electoral work and are considered as essential means in the attempts at making first-time voters take advantage of their democratic rights. Great emphasis is also put on the election outside the education system. The results from the school elections usually get a lot of media coverage, and are seen as important indicators of how successful each of the parties is at conveying their messages to the youth. Electoral researchers also see the school elections as sensitive and valuable “election polls”. The current data file is from a questionnaire carried out at the same time as the school election in 1995. At the schools that participate in the school election, the students first vote in the school election and then they answer the questionnaire.
60.588 interviews are registered for the trial election survey in 1995. Out of these, 5.007 interviews are chosen, and they constitute the current analysis file. Data from each school was first connected with information about the municipality where the school is located. In practice, this means that a few extra variables describing the surroundings of the respondents, were added to each interview. Among other things, we have added information about which county the school is located in, if the school is located in an urban or rural municipality, the proportion of unemployment in the municipality and the average income in the municipality. This is done to provide opportunities for studying the extent to which features of the environment or the environment itself is part of shaping attitudes and behavior. We have also added one variable showing the No percentage in the municipality of the school at the referendum regarding the EC on the...
Many but not all metadata providers use ELSST Thesaurus for their keywords.
Keywords
Not available
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
03/09/1995 - 04/09/1995
Country
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
The schools choose if they want to participate in the school election.
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Not available
Funding information
Funder
Ministry of Education and Research
Access
Publisher
Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research