Summary information

Study title

International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS), Germany

Creator

Lehmann, Rainer (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

Study number / PID

ZA6847, Version 1.0.0 (GESIS)

10.4232/1.13515 (DOI)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) measured proficiency on three scales: prose literacy, document literacy, and quantitative literacy. In addition, also background information of participants were assessed: general information (e.g., age, sex, country of birth, language); education (e.g., highest educational achievement, current education, participation in training); current status and work history; current and recent work (e.g., profession, self-employment, and income); skill use (Literacy, Numeracy) at work. Background questionnaire: 1. General information: born in Germany; country of birth; highest level of schooling before immigration (ISCED); years of formal education completed; highest level of schooling completed (ISCED); second level program (academic/college preparatory, bunisiness (commercial) or trade/vorcational); reasons why the respondent stopped schooling; first language (mother tongue); forein language skills; language spoken at home; language in which the respondent can express himself most easily; information on respondent´s parents: born in Germany, highest level of schooling; 2. Information on current and recent employment: current work situation; employed in the past 12 months; year last worked; number of different employers in the past 12 months; full-time or part-time employment; reasons for working part-time; Major Heading International Standard Industrial Classification for the respondent’s primary employment(ISICR); Major Heading International Standard Classification of Occupations for the respondent’s primary occupation (ISCOR); size of business; employment status; hours worked per week; during the past 12 months: number of week worked at all jobs; wanted to work in the weeks without work; reasons why the respondent did not want to work; 3. Reading and writing at work: skill use at work (Literacy: e.g. letters or memos, reports, articles, magazines or journal, etc.); write or fill out as part of main job (letters or...
Read more

Keywords

Not available

Methodology

Data collection period

09/1994 - 12/1994

Country

Germany

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Not available

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Probability: Multistage
Multistage, proportionally stratified systematic random selection of households in West- and East-Germany. For more details, please see Murray, Kirsch, & Jenkins (1998). Using systematic sampling, electoral districts are selected for the master samples with probability proportional to the number of households. The electoral districts are classified by region, district, community size, district council, quarter, and vote area. Two master samples (West- and East-Germany) of sampling points were used, with the selection of addresses being made using the random route method. At each of the 525 sampling points, a single random route of 23 addresses was followed, and in each of them nine addresses were selected. On each survey form, a random listing of the digits 1 - 9 was provided. The interviewer interviewed individuals designated by the first digit in that series which was less than or equal to the number of eligible individuals. In each household the interviewed person was selected by the Kish method.

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Face-to-face interview
Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Background questionnaire: Face-to-face interview; Literacy: paper-based measurement (self-administered)

Access

Publisher

GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences

Publication year

2020

Terms of data access

C - Data and documents are only released for academic research and teaching after the data depositor's written authorization. For this purpose the Data Archive obtains a written permission with specification of the user and the analysis intention.

Related publications

Not available