Summary information

Study title

Formation of Policy Networks and Lobbying in Slovenia, 1996 and 2012

Creator

Fink-Hafner, Danica (Center za politološke raziskave, Fakulteta za družbene vede)

Study number / PID

POLMR_12 (ADP)

URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADPPOLMR_12 (NUK)

https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_POLMR_12_V1 (doi)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Oblikovanje policy mrež in lobiranje v Sloveniji = Formation of Policy Networks and Lobbying in Slovenia

Series 'Formation of Policy Networks and Lobbying in Slovenia' explores the most influential stakeholders from eleven selected sectorial policies. It is carried out every few years, in the theoretically reasonable periods. Survey is based on mezzo concept of "policy networks". The concept is used in the following areas of empirical research: a) the study of the development of interest-group system and its operation in the process of democratic transition, b) the analysis of the internal structure and characteristics of the relationships entered into by stakeholders and decision-makers in...

Read more

Abstract

The main purpose of the research Formation of Policy Networks and Lobbying in Slovenia in 1996 was to examine the changes that occurred due to the transition process in Slovenia. Highly interdisciplinary group of researchers covered social, economic and other changes in policy. The main research question was a dynamics and over time changes of policy network in the process of profound changes in the political system. In the spring of 2012, the survey was carried out with the same main research question, as it did that of 1996, thus the formation of policy networks in the period of political change. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of Slovenian integration into the European Union on strategies of stakeholders over time and through different periods (before joining, in the period of association and full membership). Therefore questions focusing explicitly on the international engagement and participation of stakeholders were added in the questionnaire. Project in both time points combines two main research objectives: through cross-sectorial comparison acquire explanatory insight into the process of forming policy networks during the transition period (1996) or the integration into the European Union (2012) and Sectorial or thematic approach for revealing the characteristics of policy networks and dynamics through. The 2012 survey was part of international project called Comperative research on interest group politics in Europe – INTEREURO. The main purpose of this project was to promote a more comprehensive theoretical and empirical understanding of the role interest groups play in the European polity.The main purpose of the research Formation of Policy Networks and Lobbying in Slovenia in 1996 was to examine the changes that occurred due to the transition process in Slovenia. Highly interdisciplinary group of researchers covered social, economic and other changes in policy. The main research question was a dynamics and over time changes of...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

06/1996

Country

Slovenia

Time dimension

Longitudinal: Panel

Analysis unit

OtherInterest Group

Universe

53 organizations / groups in eleven areas of sectorial policies (economic, social, residential, agricultural, to the disabled, environmental protection, health, education, culture, sports, and marketing / public relations), who were at this time or in 1996, when was the first wave of research, the most active in the field of individual sectorial policies.

Sampling procedure

Non-probability

Kind of data

NumericNumeric

Data collection mode

Face-to-face interview: PAPI

Funding information

Grant number

L5-7832; P5-0136; N5-0014; 10-ECRP-008

Access

Publisher

Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov = Social Science Data Archives

Publication year

2024

Terms of data access

The data and materials are licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials.