The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Rising powers: Social equality forum China: Focus group transcripts 2013
Creator
Munro, N, University of Glasgow
White, S, University of Glasgow
Study number / PID
852589 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852589 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This data set consists of transcripts from 10 focus group discussions on themes related to social equality in China. The focus group discussions were conducted by Horizon Research Consultancy using a discussion guide written by the Investigators. They were held in nine cities chosen to represent east, west and south China, including 4 provincial capitals: Beijing, Changsha, Guangzhou, and Shanghai, and 5 prefecture level cities:
Baoding, Fuzhou, Luoyang, Mianyang, and Suzhou. The respondents included a mix of ages, genders, blue and white collar workers, and included at least one migrant (from another province) in each focus group. Separate focus group discussions were held for respondents with mainly urban hukou (residence registration) and for respondents with mainly rural hukou. There were two discussions in Guangzhou, one for each residence registration category. The focus groups in Baoding and Suzhou were held only for respondents age 18-29. Further details of recruitment and stratification are given in the documentation.
The focus group discussions dealt with household and national economic change, perceptions of social fairness, and welfare values. Specifically, respondents were asked about the state of the national and local economies, their household economy, how they define rich and poor people and how they position themselves in relation to these categories. They were asked about whether they perceived differences in wealth between individuals, regions and between urban and rural areas as fair, and whether such differences are increasing or decreasing. Finally they were asked about whether the rich should take more responsibility for the welfare of the poor, about their own personal responsibility and that of the state and businesses.
Prior to taking part in the focus group discussions, participants completed a screening questionnaire, which also served to collect basic information, including gender, age, marital status, ethnicity, level of...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
22/09/2013 - 04/12/2013
Country
China
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
10 focus group discussions (FGDs) were held, stratified as follows:(1) By location: a. five in capital cities (including 1 in Beijing, 1 in Shanghai, 2 in Guangzhou, 1 in Changsha) b. five in prefecture-level (diji) cities including 2 in Eastern China, 2 in Central China and 1 in Western China(2) By hukou of majority of respondents: a. Five focus groups mainly for respondents with agricultural hukoub. Five focus groups mainly for respondents with urban hukou(3) By age group of respondents:a. Two focus groups for respondents 18-29 (“youth”)b. Eight focus groups for respondents age 30 to 70+ (“adults”)In each FGD, 8 respondents, with a mix within groups of gender, age and type of employment, defined as follows:(1) Gender: male/female(2) Age: a. younger: defined as 18-25 in youth FGDs or 30-49 in adult FGDs;b. older: defined as 26-30 in youth FGDs or 51+ in adult FGDs(3) Type of employment (or most recent employment if retired): a. For those with urban hukou, classified by type of work as:i. white collar (including both professionals and routine clerical workers as well as students, teachers etc.) ii. blue collar (including both manufacturing and non-intellectual service workers, eg. hairdressers, waiters)b. For those with rural hukou, classified by type of industry as:i. Service industries (including catering, retail etc. – all types of jobs where the worker deals directly with the customer)ii. Production industries (including manufacturing, cleaning, transportation etc. including all types of jobs where the worker does not deal directly with the customer)(4) Hukou: At least one migrant was included in each group (migrant=living in urban area but having a non-local, agricultural hukou).