The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Exploring the Use of Antibiotics on Small-Scale Pig Farms in Kiambu County, Kenya, 2022
Creator
Scott, C, University of Bristol
Study number / PID
857083 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-857083 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Practices around antibiotic use (ABU), such as drivers for use and administration of antibiotics, were unknown for small-scale pig farms in Kiambu County – a peri-urban area of Nairobi. Murungi et al. discussed food safety concerns owing to an increase in demand and therefore supply of pork in Nairobi, Kenya (2021). One such concern was that withdrawal periods after administering antibiotics were often not observed by small-scale pig farmers in peri-urban areas of Nairobi. Abattoir testing for antibiotic residues has since been completed from meat samples from one local independent abattoir (Bor et al., 2023) which is predominantly supplied by small farms in the immediate neighbouring areas (Murungi et al., 2021). This analysis found 41% of pork samples collected tested positive for the presence of antibiotic residues, adding to these food safety concerns.
Therefore, this study aimed to understand ABU on small-scale pig farms in Kiambu County and offer possible future improvements in this area. To do this, we first wanted to understand which ABU collection method was most appropriate to understand ABU at the farm-level in this context. We undertook a problem identification and exploration project to evaluate methods for collecting instances of ABU in this specific context by trialling four methods in parallel: waste bucket analysis; medicine-recording sheets; weekly semi-structured interview and the ‘Drug Bag’.
To evaluate these methods, we recruited 13 farms into the project. Following an initial interview, we placed waste buckets and medicine recording sheets onto the farms and visited farms approximately weekly for around one month. At each weekly visit, we carried out semi-structured interview to explore instances of ABU over the previous week and completed an audit of the waste bucket and medicine recording sheet. On the final visit we also completed the 'Drug Bag', which is an exercise in which participants sort a bag of antibiotics purchased from the...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/09/2022 - 30/12/2022
Country
Kenya
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Audio
Data collection mode
This study used social science methods. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 farmers each of whom supplied a local independant abattoir in the county. A geographic spread was achieved across the sub-county. Three semi-structured interviews were carried out with government veterinarians working within Kiambu County. Finally, two focus group discussions were carried out with animal health professionals. One was with seven private veterinarians and another was with five veterinary animal health assistants, all of whom operated within the county. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling to achieve a heterogenous sample.
Funding information
Grant number
Unknown
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2024
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.