The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Tenancy as a Strategy Among Rural Poor People in India, 2006-2007
Creator
Olsen, W., University of Manchester
Study number / PID
8392 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-8392-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This module of research under the heading "income opportunities, inequality and the poor" of Global Poverty Research Group (www.gprg.org) examines earnings opportunities for poor people in Indian contexts using secondary data, primary survey data and qualitative data. The research includes three main sub-areas. Firstly secondary data were used to review agricultural productivity differences across farm types in the context of a growing female contribution to the labour of farming. Pay and employment status differences by gender and class have been written up separately. A typology of tenant households will highlight the use of tenancy by poor workers to offset their shortage of land and water. Secondly, primary data from two village bases [data submitted here] are being used to examine strategic choices made at household and individual level regarding strategies for exiting poverty, including tenancy as a strategy. See www.ruralvisits.org for details. Thirdly, the possibility that trajectories for exiting poverty might include attempts to rent in land will be considered using detailed case studies. Some implications for agencies which support agricultural development and which provide inputs, extension, credit and infrastructure are being discussed in the final analysis of the data. Previous studies show that national datasets understate the extent of tenancy. The literature review conducted in 2003 showed that existing theoretical options for studying tenancy also leave a few gaps. Specifically, the resource allocation theory presumes that households maximise income, without allowing for risk and vulnerability; the marxist theory assumes that tenancy is a polarising factor whereas data shows more nuanced variations in experience; and neoclassical theories have tended to suffer from methodological individualism. In order to offset these gaps, the proposed research will explore how strategies...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/12/2006 - 01/02/2007
Country
India
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Families/households
Individuals
Subnational
Universe
Household, Individual
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Self-administered questionnaire
Field observation
Face-to-face interview
Funding information
Grant number
M571 25 5001
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.