The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Conservation, markets and justice - Part 2: Ethnographic participatory video data
Creator
Martin, A, University of East Anglia
Kebede, B, University of East Anglia
Sikor, T, University of East Anglia
Gross-Camp, N, University of East Anglia
Rodriguez, I, University of East Anglia
Study number / PID
852476 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852476 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Our project on Conservation, Markets and Justice explores conceptions of environmental justice as a means to understand the tensions between biodiversity conservation and local livelihoods of people in the tropics. It does so through a three-pronged methodological approach, including semi-structured surveys, experimental games and ethnographic studies (including participatory videos). This dataset includes a set of participatory videos, a participatory video photo story; a final report; a summary report of participatory video in the village of Ruhatwe and guidelines for ethnographic studies related to our project.
This participatory video data is related to the other datasets as it forms part of a collection of research into local conceptions of environmental justice(see Related Resources).This research project will contribute to the challenge to reconcile forest conservation with social justice for local people in developing countries. To do so, the project will generate new empirical data about what social justice means to these local people and work with donors, NGOs and policy-makers to bring this new knowledge into practice.
The project will conduct research in three countries, China, Tanzania and Venezuela. In each site we will research local conceptions of environmental justice, for example what different groups of local people consider to be the fairest way of making decisions about forest management options, and what they consider to be the fairest way of distributing the costs and benefits associated with any intervention. We will test for the presence of some well known principles of justice using surveys and experimental economic games. But we will also employ more open, ethnographic methods for a more inductive approach to identifying justice norms. In addition to comparisons across countries and across intervention type, we will compare local conceptions of justice with those that are evident in the conservation interventions in that particular...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
30/09/2013 - 29/09/2016
Country
United Kingdom, Bolivia, China, Tanzania
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Household
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Video
Data collection mode
We have employed a variety of techniques to collect the data required by our conceptual framework: in-depth interviews, direct observation, informal conversations, key informant interviews, compilation of grey and published literature, focus groups discussions and collection of the video footage. When the country teams planned the data collection, two considerations were important. First, they kept a close eye on the feasibility of their plans considering the limited time and resources available. For this reason they made selective use of the suggested data collection techniques set out below. Second, prior to the use of footage from the participatory video projects they secured local people’s consent to the use of footage in the analysis. In addition, local people agreed that the researchers can use observations and informal conversations taking place during the video making in the ethnographic analysis. This was addressed explicitly when villagers’ consent is sought prior to the video projects.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/K005812/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2017
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available from an external repository. Access is available via Related Resources.